Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19806416›Full record

ReviewAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2009

Methodological issues in research on web-based behavioral interventions.

Brian G Danaher, John R Seeley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Finding My Way: results of a multicentre RCT evaluating a web-based self-guided psychosocial intervention for newly diagnosed cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Trial

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian G DanaherOregon Research Institute, 1715 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403, USA. briand@ori.org
John R Seeley

Funding

XChew Net--Internet Smokeless Tobacco CessationR01CA084225 · NCI · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SEVERSON, HERBERT H · 2001 to 2011
$3.5M
QuitSpit: An Internet-Based Smokeless Tobacco Cessation Program for TeensR01CA118575 · NCI · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SEVERSON, HERBERT H · 2006 to 2010
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA118575NCI NIH HHS CA84225NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084225NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeb-based behavioral intervention research is rapidly growing. PURPOSE: We review methodological issues shared across Web-based intervention research to help inform future research in this area.

methodsWe examine measures and their interpretation using exemplar studies and our research.

resultsWe report on research designs used to evaluate Web-based interventions and recommend newer, blended designs. We review and critique methodological issues associated with recruitment, engagement, and social validity.

conclusionsWe suggest that there is value to viewing this burgeoning realm of research from the broader context of behavior change research. We conclude that many studies use blended research designs, that innovative mantling designs such as the Multiphase Optimization Strategy and Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial methods hold considerable promise and should be used more widely, and that Web-based controls should be used instead of usual care or no-treatment controls in public health research. We recommend topics for future research that address participant recruitment, engagement, and social validity.

Indexed as

InternetBehavior TherapyHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionPatient SelectionResearch DesignTherapy, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID19806416
PMCPMC3846298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.