Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19806336›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2009

The influence of different IMRT techniques on the peripheral dose: a comparison between sMLM-IMRT and helical tomotherapy.

Tilo Wiezorek, Andrea Schwahofer, Kai Schubert

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Node-positive left-sided breast cancer: does VMAT improve treatment plan quality with respect to IMRT?Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2013
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dosimetric integration of daily mega-voltage cone-beam CT for image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Erlotinib-induced rash spares previously irradiated skin.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2011
    Article
  12. CT-myelography for high-dose irradiation of spinal and paraspinal tumors with helical tomotherapy: revival of an old tool.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2011
    Article
  13. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for treatment of adrenal gland metastases from non-small cell lung cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Volumetric modulated arc therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2010
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Treatment results of radiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2010
    Article
  18. Second malignancies in high‑dose areas of previous tumor radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tilo WiezorekDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany. tilo.wiezorek@med.uni-jena.de
Andrea Schwahofer
Kai Schubert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate how segmented multileaf modulation-(sMLM-)based intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and dynamic helical tomotherapy (ToTh) affect the peripheral dose (PD) outside the treated region. MATERIAL AND

methodsA cuboid Perspex phantom was scanned in a computed tomograph. Different artificial cases were contoured consisting of OARs surrounded by cylindrically shaped planning target volumes (PTVs) with different dimensions. Radiotherapy plans were generated with the sMLM system Konrad (Siemens) and with the ToTh planning system. The plans were optimized in such a way that the dose-volume histograms showed comparable results. The sMLM plans were applied with a linac Primus (Siemens OCS), the ToTh plans with the HiArt system (TomoTherapy); both with 6 MV. Measurements of PDs were performed along the longitudinal axis of the phantom outside the primary beam at different distances from the edge of the PTV (horizontal PD) and also at different depths at a fixed distance from the isocenter (vertical PD). Additional experiments to separate the scatter dose caused by the phantom were performed. This was realized by removing the part of the phantom lying in the primary beam, then applying the same plans like before.

resultsAll PD values were normalized to the median dose of the PTV. The PD values for the different PTVs decrease with decreasing PTV size. They also decrease with increasing distance from the isocenter. The horizontal values are in a range of 7% for the largest PTV (diameter = 15 cm) near the primary dose region to 0.2% for the smallest PTV (diameter = 5 cm) far from the primary dose region. The ToTh values are higher than the sMLM values by a maximal factor of 2 near the primary dose region. They become more similar with increasing distance from the edge of the PTV in longitudinal direction. The PD values are nearly equal at a distance of 25 cm from the edge of the PTV. The vertical PDs are higher for the ToTh at depths of > 1 cm but higher for sMLM close to the surface. By removing the scatter cube, the horizontal PD values at middle distances are reduced to one third of the PD values with scatter cube for ToTh (0.5%) and to one half for sMLM (0.8%). This means that without scatter cube the PD for ToTh is lower than that for sMLM. The measured PD values without scatter cube are in the same dimension as published data.

conclusionThe increasing PDs and their trend with increasing PTV size can be explained by Compton scattering of photons from the irradiated volume toward the off-axis measuring points. The further increase of the PD in case of ToTh relative to sMLM is not easy to explain. Different presumptions are possible. The larger field length (in longitudinal direction) of the ToTh plans (consisting of the "real" field length and the overlap) relative to the sMLM plans could be one reason for the higher PD values. The softer energy spectrum of the HiArt machine with more sideward Compton scattering contributions could be another reason.

Indexed as

Body BurdenPhantoms, ImagingTomography, Spiral ComputedRadiometryRadiotherapy, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedScattering, Radiation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.