Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19806287›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2010

Diagnosis and referral of rheumatoid arthritis by primary care physician: results of a pilot study on the city of Pisa, Italy.

Alessandra Della Rossa, Rossella Neri, Rosaria Talarico, Marica Doveri, Arianna Consensi, Stefano Salvadori, Valentina Lorenzoni, Giuseppe Turchetti, Stefania Bellelli, Massimiliano Cazzato and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Costs associated with rheumatoid arthritis in Italy: past, present, and future.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandra Della RossaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, S. Chiara Hospital, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy. a.dellarossa@int.med.unipi.it
Rossella Neri
Rosaria Talarico
Marica Doveri
Arianna Consensi
Stefano Salvadori
Valentina Lorenzoni
Giuseppe Turchetti
Stefania Bellelli
Massimiliano Cazzato
Laura Bazzichi
Paolo Monicelli
Stefano Moscardini
Stefano Bombardieri
University of Pisa · ITIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to evaluate, in the city of Pisa: (1) the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis; (2) the reliability of the prevalence estimated by primary care physicians, using the rheumatologist's diagnosis as the "gold standard" and (3) the economic impact of the disease. The Tuscany registry of primary care physicians constituted the framework from which a sample of subjects was selected. The rheumatoid arthritis (RA) subjects >18 years followed by each primary care physician constituted the population studied. Each general practitioner (GP) was asked to fill out a questionnaire regarding their patients affected by RA and to send it to the tertiary rheumatologic centre, where the diagnosis was confirmed/discarded, the clinical and epidemiological data were collected in a standardized form and a number of data for the estimation of costs were gathered. The estimated prevalence of RA was 5.1 per thousand (CI, 4.4-5.7). The reliability of general practitioners in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis was on the whole 69%. However, when an analysis of every physician was carried out, a high degree of heterogeneity in the prevalence of RA per physician was found. Overall, the mean annual cost per patient with RA was estimated at about 5,878 euro (euro; median, 6,434 euro; inter quartile range, 669-7,052 euro), with a high variability mainly dependent on the degree of patient disability. More than 90% of the overall annual cost per patient was due to the medical and non-medical direct components of costs. The prevalence of RA in Tuscany seems highly comparable with similar prevalence studies in Italy. The annual cost per patient with RA was highly variable and strictly dependent on the level of disability. More than 90% of the overall cost was due to the direct burden of costs.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians, FamilyPilot ProjectsPrevalenceQuality of LifeAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID19806287
OpenAlexW2045719347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.