Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19806035›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of clinical oncology2010

Using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to monitor clinical outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Minsig Choi, Lance K Heilbrun, Raghu Venkatramanamoorthy, Jawana M Lawhorn-Crews, Mark M Zalupski, Anthony F Shields

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of clinical oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Clinical Impact ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Usefulness ofCancer medicine · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Minsig ChoiUniversity of Mississippi, GV Montgomery VA Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Lance K Heilbrun
Raghu Venkatramanamoorthy
Jawana M Lawhorn-Crews
Mark M Zalupski
Anthony F Shields
The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL M STEMMER · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
Enhancing neoadjuvant chemotherpay responses with targeted T cellsR01CA140314 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BEPLER, GEROLD · 2010 to 2015
$2.5M
MIDCAREER INVESTIGATOR AWARDK24CA082645 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHIELDS, ANTHONY FRANK · 1999 to 2003
$464k
NCI NIH HHS CA22453NCI NIH HHS CA82645NCI NIH HHS K24 CA082645NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic cancer ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States with 5-year survival ranging from 1% to 5%. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a metabolic imaging system that is widely used for the initial staging of cancer and detecting residual disease after treatment. There are limited data, however, on the use of this molecular imaging technique to assess early tumor response after treatment in pancreatic cancer.

methodsThe objective of the study was to explore the relationship of early treatment response using the F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET with surgical outcome and overall survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. FDG-PET measurements of maximum standardized uptake value and kinetic parameters were compared with the clinical outcome.

resultsTwenty patients were enrolled in the study evaluating neoadjuvant induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (chemo-RT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. All 20 patients had prestudy PET scans and a total of fifty PET scans were performed. Among patients who were PET responders (> or =50% decrease in standardized uptake value after cycle 1), 100% (2/2) had complete surgical resection. Only 6% (1/16) had surgical resection in the PET nonresponders (<50% decrease). Two patients did not have the second PET scan because of clinical progression or treatment toxicity. Mean survival was 23.2 months for PET responders and 11.3 months for nonresponders (P = 0.234). Similar differences in survival were also noted when response was measured using Patlak analysis.

conclusionsFDG-PET can aid in monitoring the clinical outcome of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemo-RT. FDG-PET may be used to aid patients who could have complete surgical resection as well as prognosticate patients' survival.

Indexed as

Fluorine RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Neoadjuvant TherapyPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiotherapy, ConformalAdenocarcinomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinCytarabineDrug MonitoringFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateNeutronsPancreatectomyCisplatinCytarabineFluorine RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18FluorouracilRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID19806035
PMCPMC3848057
OpenAlexW2005999920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.