Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19805821›Full record

ArticleGenetics2009

Efficient transposition of Tol2 in the mouse germline.

Vincent W Keng, Barbara J Ryan, Kirk J Wangensteen, Darius Balciunas, Christian Schmedt, Stephen C Ekker, David A Largaespada

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Murine allele and transgene symbols: ensuring unique, concise, and informative nomenclature.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Physiology of the read-write genome.The Journal of physiology · 2014
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. LINE-1 elements in structural variation and disease.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2011
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Transposon transgenesis in Xenopus.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2010
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent W KengMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
Barbara J Ryan
Kirk J Wangensteen
Darius Balciunas
Christian Schmedt
Stephen C Ekker
David A Largaespada
University of Minnesota · USMasonic Cancer CenterGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
Xenograft Core for NF1 Experimental TherapeuticsP50NS057531 · NINDS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI RATNER, NANCY · 2008 to 2012
$6.8M
Intron-based Mutagenic Transposons for ZebrafishR01DA014546 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI EKKER, STEPHEN CARL · 2001 to 2011
$3.5M
Sleeping Beauty for uncovering cancer genes in miceR01CA113636 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LARGAESPADA, DAVID ANDREW · 2006 to 2016
$2.5M
Transposon-based screens for colorectal cancer genesR01CA134759 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CORMIER, ROBERT T, LARGAESPADA, DAVID ANDREW · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Transposon Mutagenesis Development and Drug AbuseR01DA014764 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LARGAESPADA, DAVID ANDREW · 2003 to 2005
$959k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598-09NCI NIH HHS R01 CA113636NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134759NIDA NIH HHS 1R01DA014764NIDA NIH HHS 5R01-DA14546NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014546NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014764NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS057531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insertional mutagenesis screens play an integral part in the annotating of functional data for all sequenced genes in the postgenomic era. Chemical mutagenesis screens are highly efficient but identifying the causative gene can be a laborious task. Other mutagenesis platforms, such as transposable elements, have been successfully applied for insertional mutagenesis screens in both the mouse and rat. However, relatively low transposition efficiency has hampered their use as a high-throughput forward genetic mutagenesis screen. Here we report the first evidence of germline activity in the mouse using a naturally active DNA transposon derived from the medaka fish called Tol2, as an alternative system for high-throughput forward genetic mutagenesis screening tool.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceDNA Transposable ElementsFemaleGerm CellsHeLa CellsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMaleMiceMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, InsertionalMutationDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID19805821
PMCPMC2787440
OpenAlexW2151231991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.