Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19805362›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Identifying sub-optimal responses to ivermectin in the treatment of River Blindness.

Thomas S Churcher, Sébastien D S Pion, Mike Y Osei-Atweneboana, Roger K Prichard, Kwablah Awadzi, Michel Boussinesq, Richard C Collins, James A Whitworth, María-Gloria Basáñez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 219 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Therapeutic efficacy and macrofilaricidal activity of doxycycline for the treatment of river blindness.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Comparison of Repeated Doses of Ivermectin Versus Ivermectin Plus Albendazole for the Treatment of Onchocerciasis: A Randomized, Open-label, Clinical Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Can mass drug administration of moxidectin accelerate onchocerciasis elimination in Africa?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. AssessingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: Current status and emerging trends.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Thomas S ChurcherDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, United Kingdom.
Sébastien D S Pion
Mike Y Osei-Atweneboana
Roger K Prichard
Kwablah Awadzi
Michel Boussinesq
Richard C Collins
James A Whitworth
María-Gloria Basáñez
Imperial College London · GBCouncil for Scientific and Industrial Research · GHInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRMcGill University · CAUniversité de Montpellier · FRWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0200123Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of drug resistance before it becomes a public health concern requires a clear distinction between what constitutes a normal and a suboptimal treatment response. A novel method of analyzing drug efficacy studies in human helminthiases is proposed and used to investigate recent claims of atypical responses to ivermectin in the treatment of River Blindness. The variability in the rate at which Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae repopulate host's skin following ivermectin treatment is quantified using an individual-based onchocerciasis mathematical model. The model estimates a single skin repopulation rate for every host sampled, allowing reports of suboptimal responses to be statistically compared with responses from populations with no prior exposure to ivermectin. Statistically faster rates of skin repopulation were observed in 3 Ghanaian villages (treated 12-17 times), despite the wide variability in repopulation rates observed in ivermectin-naïve populations. Another village previously thought to have high rates of skin repopulation was shown to be indistinguishable from the normal treatment response. The model is used to generate testable hypotheses to identify whether atypical rates of skin repopulation by microfilariae could result from low treatment coverage alone or provide evidence of decreased ivermectin efficacy. Further work linking phenotypic poor responses to treatment with parasite molecular genetics markers will be required to confirm drug resistance. Limitations of the skin-snipping method for estimating parasite load indicates that changes in the distribution of microfilarial repopulation rates, rather than their absolute values, maybe a more sensitive indicator of emerging ivermectin resistance.

Indexed as

AnimalsFilaricidesHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansIvermectinModels, TheoreticalOnchocerca volvulusOnchocerciasis, OcularSkinFilaricidesIvermectin

Identifiers

PMID19805362
PMCPMC2757820
OpenAlexW2071685455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.