Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19805156›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Triplet repeat length bias and variation in the human transcriptome.

Michael Molla, Arthur Delcher, Shamil Sunyaev, Charles Cantor, Simon Kasif

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A deep population reference panel of tandem repeat variation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Background-dependent effects of polyglutamine variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana gene ELF3.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A genomic portrait of human microsatellite variation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael MollaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Center for Advanced Biotechnology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. molla@bu.edu
Arthur Delcher
Shamil Sunyaev
Charles Cantor
Simon Kasif
Advanced Genomic Technology (United States) · USBoston University · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Informatics for Integrating Biology/ the Bedside (RMI)U54LM008748 · NLM · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2004 to 2013
$39.0M
Comparative Cross-Species Genomic Analysis SystemR33HG002850 · NHGRI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KASIF, SIMON · 2004 to 2006
$1.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS R33 HG002850NHGRI NIH HHS R33 HG002850-02NLM NIH HHS U54 LM008748NLM NIH HHS U54LM008748-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Length variation in short tandem repeats (STRs) is an important family of DNA polymorphisms with numerous applications in genetics, medicine, forensics, and evolutionary analysis. Several major diseases have been associated with length variation of trinucleotide (triplet) repeats including Huntington's disease, hereditary ataxias and spinobulbar muscular atrophy. Using the reference human genome, we have catalogued all triplet repeats in genic regions. This data revealed a bias in noncoding DNA repeat lengths. It also enabled a survey of repeat-length polymorphisms (RLPs) in human genomes and a comparison of the rate of polymorphism in humans versus divergence from chimpanzee. For short repeats, this analysis of three human genomes reveals a relatively low RLP rate in exons and, somewhat surprisingly, in introns. All short RLPs observed in multiple genomes are biallelic (at least in this small sample). In contrast, long repeats are highly polymorphic and some long RLPs are multiallelic. For long repeats, the chimpanzee sequence frequently differs from all observed human alleles. This suggests a high expansion/contraction rate in all long repeats. Expansions and contractions are not, however, affected by natural selection discernable from our comparison of human-chimpanzee divergence with human RLPs. Our catalog of human triplet repeats and their surrounding flanking regions can be used to produce a cost-effective whole-genome assay to test individuals. This repeat assay could someday complement SNP arrays for producing tests that assess the risk of an individual to develop a disease, or become part of personalized genomic strategy that provides therapeutic guidance with respect to drug response.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceDatabases, Nucleic AcidGene Expression ProfilingGene FrequencyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationGenome, HumanHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsPan troglodytesPolymorphism, GeneticTrinucleotide Repeat ExpansionTrinucleotide Repeats

Identifiers

PMID19805156
PMCPMC2746125
OpenAlexW1997438202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.