Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19805141›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Adoptively transferred effector cells derived from naive rather than central memory CD8+ T cells mediate superior antitumor immunity.

Christian S Hinrichs, Zachary A Borman, Lydie Cassard, Luca Gattinoni, Rosanne Spolski, Zhiya Yu, Luis Sanchez-Perez, Pawel Muranski, Steven J Kern, Carol Logun and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 246 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
246citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

246 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 388 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. ReducingCancer immunology research · 2018
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genes & diseases · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Immunosenescence: signaling pathways, diseases and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

186 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christian S HinrichsNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Zachary A Borman
Lydie Cassard
Luca Gattinoni
Rosanne Spolski
Zhiya Yu
Luis Sanchez-Perez
Pawel Muranski
Steven J Kern
Carol Logun
Douglas C Palmer
Yun Ji
Robert N Reger
Warren J Leonard
Robert L Danner
Steven A Rosenberg
Nicholas P Restifo
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · US

Funding

Adoptive Cell Transfer Immunotherapy of CancerZIABC010984 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2009 to 2025
$56.8M
Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZIABC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2009 to 2020
$25.0M
IL-2 Family Cytokines and their Receptors-- Biology of the IL-21 systemZIAHL005408 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI LEONARD, WARREN J · 2009 to 2025
$23.7M
IL-2 Family Cytokines and their Receptors-- Biology of the IL-2 systemZIAHL005401 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI LEONARD, WARREN J · 2009 to 2025
$22.5M
Developing new immunotherapies based of CD4+ T cellsZIABC011037 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RESTIFO, NICHOLAS · 2009 to 2014
$4.4M
Functional Genomics of Inflammation and Critical IllnessZIACL001164 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI DANNER, ROBERT L · 2009 to 2018
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effector cells derived from central memory CD8(+) T cells were reported to engraft and survive better than those derived from effector memory populations, suggesting that they are superior for use in adoptive immunotherapy studies. However, previous studies did not evaluate the relative efficacy of effector cells derived from naïve T cells. We sought to investigate the efficacy of tumor-specific effector cells derived from naïve or central memory T-cell subsets using transgenic or retrovirally transduced T cells engineered to express a tumor-specific T-cell receptor. We found that naïve, rather than central memory T cells, gave rise to an effector population that mediated superior antitumor immunity upon adoptive transfer. Effector cells developed from naïve T cells lost the expression of CD62L more rapidly than those derived from central memory T cells, but did not acquire the expression of KLRG-1, a marker for terminal differentiation and replicative senescence. Consistent with this KLRG-1(-) phenotype, naïve-derived cells were capable of a greater proliferative burst and had enhanced cytokine production after adoptive transfer. These results indicate that insertion of genes that confer antitumor specificity into naïve rather than central memory CD8(+) T cells may allow superior efficacy upon adoptive transfer.

Indexed as

Adoptive TransferImmunologic MemoryAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAutoantigensCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHumansImmunophenotypingImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsNeoplasms, ExperimentalPrimatesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSurvival RateAutoantigensReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID19805141
PMCPMC2762661
OpenAlexW2070669774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.