Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19803772›Full record

ArticleTwin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies2009

Twins eye study in Tasmania (TEST): rationale and methodology to recruit and examine twins.

David A Mackey, Jane R Mackinnon, Shayne A Brown, Lisa S Kearns, Jonathan B Ruddle, Paul G Sanfilippo, Cong Sun, Christopher J Hammond, Terri L Young, Nicholas G Martin and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

David A MackeyLions Eye Institute, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Australia. D.Mackey@utas.edu.au
Jane R Mackinnon
Shayne A Brown
Lisa S Kearns
Jonathan B Ruddle
Paul G Sanfilippo
Cong Sun
Christopher J Hammond
Terri L Young
Nicholas G Martin
Alex W Hewitt
Centre for Eye Research Australia · AURoyal Hobart Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUCenter for Human Genetics · USQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

The Molecular Genetics of High MyopiaR01EY014685 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI YOUNG, TERRI LOIS · 2003 to 2017
$8.1M
International Collaborative Twin Study of Refractive and Glaucoma EndophenotypesR01EY018246 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, TERRI LOIS · 2007 to 2009
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014685NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual impairment is a leading cause of morbidity and poor quality of life in our community. Unravelling the mechanisms underpinning important blinding diseases could allow preventative or curative steps to be implemented. Twin siblings provide a unique opportunity in biology to discover genes associated with numerous eye diseases and ocular biometry. Twins are particularly useful for quantitative trait analysis through genome-wide association and linkage studies. Although many studies involving twins rely on twin registries, we present our approach to the Twins Eye Study in Tasmania to provide insight into possible recruitment strategies, expected participation rates and potential examination strategies that can be considered by other researchers for similar studies. Five separate avenues for cohort recruitment were adopted: (1) piggy-backing existing studies where twins had been recruited, (2) utilizing the national twin registry, (3) word-of-mouth and local media publicity, (4) directly approaching schools, and finally (5) collaborating with other research groups studying twins.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildCohort StudiesDiseases in TwinsEye DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociRegistriesSurveys and QuestionnairesTasmania

Identifiers

PMID19803772
PMCPMC3855231
OpenAlexW2100755271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.