Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19802885›Full record

ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2010

Novel wavelengths for laser nerve stimulation.

Ryan G McCaughey, Cara Chlebicki, Brian J F Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. European journal of translational myology · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Optical Stimulation of Neurons.Current molecular imaging · 2014
    Article
  14. Photons and neurons.Hearing research · 2014
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Radiant energy during infrared neural stimulation at the target structure.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2013
    Article
  19. Infrared neural stimulation in the cochlea.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2013
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryan G McCaugheyBeckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine, California 92612, USA. ryanmccaughey@hotmail.com
Cara Chlebicki
Brian J F Wong

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Christine Hui · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
WOUND MIGRATION FORCE MONITORINGP41RR001192 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LYUBOVITSKY, JULIA · 1985 to 2011
$14.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaser light is known to stimulate nerves. This study investigated alternative wavelengths for nerve stimulation. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe sciatic nerves of rats were irradiated with four different lasers-a Ho:YAG (2100 nm), a Yb:glass fiber laser (1495 nm) and diode lasers (1450 nm and 1540 nm).

resultsAll lasers evoked a visible leg twitch response, and electromyography confirmed muscle activation. The Yb:glass laser at 1495 nm delivered through a single mode fiber was found to be the most effective stimulus. The stimulation threshold for a 2 millisecond pulse from the Yb:glass laser was determined to be 3.7+/-2.8 mJ/cm(2).

conclusionsThe Yb:glass laser has the potential for use in neurostimulation, as an alternative to electrical stimulation.

Indexed as

Lasers, SemiconductorLasers, Solid-StateAnimalsElectric Stimulation TherapyElectromyographyLow-Level Light TherapyNeural ConductionRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySciatic Nerve

Identifiers

PMID19802885
PMCPMC4144435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.