ReviewBone marrow transplantation2009
Future of cord blood for oncology uses.
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Umbilical cord blood banking: from personal donation to international public registries to global bioeconomy.Journal of blood medicine · 2014Review
- To transplant or not: a dilemma for treatment of elderly AML patients in the twenty-first century.Bone marrow transplantation · 2013Review
- A comparative analysis of the opinions from European national and international ethics committees regarding the collection, storage and use of umbilical cord blood.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2012Review
- Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for MDS.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utilization of umbilical cord blood (UCB) as a source of stem cells for transplantation has grown substantially in the last decade. Already an established practice for the treatment of children with hematological malignancies, its application for the treatment of adults is also expanding. The development of the double UCB and reduced-intensity transplantation platforms have contributed to this expansion. Recent registry-based analysis and ongoing single institution and multicenter clinical trials are investigating ways to make UCB transplantation more widely available. We review here the background data on the utilization of UCB for the treatment of hematological malignancies, and discuss the current challenges and future directions in the field of UCB transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19802022What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.