Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19801651›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2009

Roles of two Ca2+-binding domains in regulation of the cardiac Na+-Ca2+ exchanger.

Michela Ottolia, Debora A Nicoll, Kenneth D Philipson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Modulation of the cardiac NaCell calcium · 2020
    Review
  13. Molecular determinants of pH regulation in the cardiac NaThe Journal of general physiology · 2018
    Article
  14. The Role of Sodium in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in physiology · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Modeling NaJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michela OttoliaDepartment of Physiology and the Cardiovascular Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095-1760, USA. mottolia@mednet.ucla.edu
Debora A Nicoll
Kenneth D Philipson
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

STRUCTURE/FUNCTION OF CARDIAC SODIUM/CALCIUM EXCHANGER01HL049101 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PHILIPSON, KENNETH · 1993 to 2011
$5.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL49101NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL049101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We expressed full-length Na(+)-Ca(2+) exchangers (NCXs) with mutations in two Ca(2+)-binding domains (CBD1 and CBD2) to determine the roles of the CBDs in Ca(2+)-dependent regulation of NCX. CBD1 has four Ca(2+)-binding sites, and mutation of residues Asp(421) and Glu(451), which primarily coordinate Ca(2+) at sites 1 and 2, had little effect on regulation of NCX by Ca(2+). In contrast, mutations at residues Glu(385), Asp(446), Asp(447), and Asp(500), which coordinate Ca(2+) at sites 3 and 4 of CBD1, resulted in a drastic decrease in the apparent affinity of peak exchange current for regulatory Ca(2+). Another mutant, M7, with 7 key residues of CBD1 replaced, showed a further decrease in apparent Ca(2+) affinity but retained regulation, confirming a contribution of CBD2 to Ca(2+) regulation. Addition of the mutation K585E (located in CBD2) into the M7 background induced a marked increase in Ca(2+) affinity for both steady-state and peak currents. Also, we have shown previously that the CBD2 mutations E516L and E683V have no Ca(2+)-dependent regulation. We now demonstrate that introduction of a positive charge at these locations rescues Ca(2+)-dependent regulation. Finally, our data demonstrate that deletion of the unstructured loops between beta-strands F and G of both CBDs does not alter the regulation of the exchanger by Ca(2+), indicating that these segments are not important in regulation. Thus, CBD1 and CBD2 have distinct roles in Ca(2+)-dependent regulation of NCX. CBD1 determines the affinity of NCX for regulatory Ca(2+), although CBD2 is also necessary for Ca(2+)-dependent regulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCalciumCrystallography, X-RayCytoplasmGene Expression RegulationIonsMutagenesisMutationOocytesProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Structure, TertiarySodium-Calcium ExchangerXenopus laevisCalciumIonsSodium-Calcium Exchanger

Identifiers

PMID19801651
PMCPMC2781690
OpenAlexW2047519206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.