ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2009
Reproductive and diurnal rhythms regulate vocal motor plasticity in a teleost fish.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gap junction-mediated glycinergic inhibition ensures precise temporal patterning in vocal behavior.eLife · 2021Article
- Cross-species physiological interactions of endocrine disrupting chemicals with the circadian clock.General and comparative endocrinology · 2021Review
- Neural transcriptome reveals molecular mechanisms for temporal control of vocalization across multiple timescales.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Neuroendocrine control of seasonal plasticity in the auditory and vocal systems of fish.Frontiers in neuroendocrinology · 2015Review
- Melatonin action in a midbrain vocal-acoustic network.The Journal of experimental biology · 2014Article
- Vocal corollary discharge communicates call duration to vertebrate auditory system.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013Article
- Localization and divergent profiles of estrogen receptors and aromatase in the vocal and auditory networks of a fish with alternative mating tactics.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2013Article
- Shared developmental and evolutionary origins for neural basis of vocal-acoustic and pectoral-gestural signaling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012Review
- Innovations in motoneuron synchrony drive rapid temporal modulations in vertebrate acoustic signaling.Journal of neurophysiology · 2012Article
- Nonlinear acoustic complexity in a fish 'two-voice' system.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2011Article
- Vocalization frequency and duration are coded in separate hindbrain nuclei.Nature communications · 2011Article
- Seasonal plasticity of auditory hair cell frequency sensitivity correlates with plasma steroid levels in vocal fish.The Journal of experimental biology · 2011Article
- Neural and hormonal mechanisms of reproductive-related arousal in fishes.Hormones and behavior · 2011Review
- Neurobiology of vocal communication: mechanisms for sensorimotor integration and vocal patterning.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2010Review
- Divergent expression of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and 11beta-hydroxylase genes between male morphs in the central nervous system, sonic muscle and testis of a vocal fish.General and comparative endocrinology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Seasonal and circadian rhythms control fundamental physiological processes including neural excitability and synaptic plasticity that can lead to the periodic modulation of motor behaviors like social vocalizations. Parental male midshipman fish produce three call types during the breeding season: long duration (min to >1 h) advertisement 'hums', frequency and amplitude modulated agonistic 'growls' (s), and very brief (ms) agonistic 'grunts' produced either singly or repetitively as ;grunt trains' for up to several minutes. Fictive grunts that establish the temporal properties of natural grunts are readily evoked and recorded in vivo from vocal occipital nerve roots at any time of day or year by electrical microstimulation in either the midbrain periaqueductal gray or a hindbrain vocal pre-pacemaker nucleus. Now, as shown here, the longer duration fictive growls and hums can also be elicited, but are restricted to the nocturnal reproductive season. A significant drop in call threshold accompanies the fictive growls and hums that are distinguished by their much longer duration and lower and more regular firing frequency. Lastly, the long duration fictive calls are dependent upon increased stimulation time and intensity and hence may result from activity-dependent changes in the vocal motor circuit that are themselves modulated by seasonal and circadian rhythms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.