Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19801172›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2009

Characterizing natural variation using next-generation sequencing technologies.

Yoav Gilad, Jonathan K Pritchard, Kevin Thornton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Contribution of unfixed transposable element insertions to human regulatory variation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. A How-To Guide for Mode of Action Analysis of Antimicrobial Peptides.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Exome and genome sequencing for inborn errors of immunity.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Defining the biological bases of individual differences in musicality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yoav GiladDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. gilad@uchicago.edu
Jonathan K Pritchard
Kevin Thornton

Funding

Integrating genomics and gene expression analyses to map CVD-associated lociR01HL092206 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GILAD, YOAV · 2009 to 2021
$7.3M
Analysis and interpretation of noncoding regulatory variationR01MH084703 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GILAD, YOAV, PRITCHARD, JONATHAN K · 2008 to 2015
$3.4M
Natural Selection on Gene Regulation in HumansR01GM077959 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GILAD, YOAV · 2006 to 2014
$2.9M
Population genetics of gene duplications and copy-number variants in the DrosophiR01GM085183 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI THORNTON, KEVIN R. · 2009 to 2013
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL092206NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092206NIGMS NIH HHS GM077959NIGMS NIH HHS GM085183NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077959NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085183NIMH NIH HHS MH084703NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in evolutionary genomics is tightly coupled with the development of new technologies to collect high-throughput data. The availability of next-generation sequencing technologies has the potential to revolutionize genomic research and enable us to focus on a large number of outstanding questions that previously could not be addressed effectively. Indeed, we are now able to study genetic variation on a genome-wide scale, characterize gene regulatory processes at unprecedented resolution, and soon, we expect that individual laboratories might be able to rapidly sequence new genomes. However, at present, the analysis of next-generation sequencing data is challenging, in particular because most sequencing platforms provide short reads, which are difficult to align and assemble. In addition, only little is known about sources of variation that are associated with next-generation sequencing study designs. A better understanding of the sources of error and bias in sequencing data is essential, especially in the context of studies of variation at dynamic quantitative traits.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsBase SequenceEvolution, MolecularGene Expression ProfilingGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID19801172
PMCPMC3994700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.