Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19799798›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2009

Role of key-regulator genes in melanoma susceptibility and pathogenesis among patients from South Italy.

Milena Casula, Antonio Muggiano, Antonio Cossu, Mario Budroni, Corrado Caracò, Paolo A Ascierto, Elena Pagani, Ignazio Stanganelli, Sergio Canzanella, Mariacristina Sini and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Vitamin D status and risk for malignant cutaneous melanoma: recent advances.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Update in genetic susceptibility in melanoma.Annals of translational medicine · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Milena CasulaIstituto di Chimica Biomolecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Sassari, Italy.
Antonio Muggiano
Antonio Cossu
Mario Budroni
Corrado Caracò
Paolo A Ascierto
Elena Pagani
Ignazio Stanganelli
Sergio Canzanella
Mariacristina Sini
Grazia Palomba
Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI)
Giuseppe Palmieri
Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITAssociazione Italiana Vulvodinia Onlus · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 · ITIstituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral genetic alterations have been demonstrated to contribute to the development and progression of melanoma. In this study, we further investigated the impact of key-regulator genes in susceptibility and pathogenesis of such a disease.

methodsA large series (N = 846) of sporadic and familial cases originating from South Italy was screened for germline mutations in p16(CDKN2A), BRCA2, and MC1R genes by DHPLC analysis and automated DNA sequencing. Paired primary melanomas and lymph node metastases from same patients (N = 35) as well as melanoma cell lines (N = 18) were analyzed for somatic mutations in NRAS, BRAF, and p16(CDKN2A) genes.

resultsFor melanoma susceptibility, investigations at germline level indicated that p16(CDKN2A) was exclusively mutated in 16/545 (2.9%) non-Sardinian patients, whereas BRCA2 germline mutations were observed in 4/91 (4.4%) patients from North Sardinia only. Two MC1R germline variants, Arg151Cys and Asp294His, were significantly associated with melanoma in Sardinia. Regarding genetic events involved in melanoma pathogenesis at somatic level, mutually-exclusive mutations of NRAS and BRAF genes were observed at quite same rate (about two thirds) in cultured and in vivo melanomas (either primary or metastatic lesions). Conversely, p16(CDKN2A) gene alterations were observed at increased rates moving from primary to metastatic melanomas and melanoma cell lines. Activation of the ERK gene product was demonstrated to be consistently induced by a combination of molecular alterations (NRAS/BRAF mutations and p16(CDKN2A) silencing).

conclusionOur findings further clarified that: a) mutation prevalence in melanoma susceptibility genes may vary within each specific geographical area; b) multiple molecular events are accumulating during melanomagenesis.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityBRCA2 ProteinCell Line, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansItalyMelanomaMutationNeoplasm ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAF protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Neoplasm ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID19799798
PMCPMC2763007
OpenAlexW2081887960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.