Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19798762›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2010

Use of a folding model and in situ spectroscopic techniques for rational formulation development and stability testing of monoclonal antibody therapeutics.

Gauri Rao, Vandana Iyer, Matthew P Kosloski, Dipak S Pisal, Eunkyoung Shin, C Russell Middaugh, Sathy V Balu-Iyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Immunogenicity Challenges Associated with Subcutaneous Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021
    Review
  5. Analytical chemistry · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gauri RaoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Amherst, New York 14260, USA.
Vandana Iyer
Matthew P Kosloski
Dipak S Pisal
Eunkyoung Shin
C Russell Middaugh
Sathy V Balu-Iyer

Funding

HL-Development and Pharmacology of novel lipidic rAHF and biotherapeuticsR01HL070227 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BALU-IYER, SATHY VENKAT · 2002 to 2019
$5.0M
Stopped flow spectrofluorometerS10RR015877 · NCRR · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI STRAUBINGER, ROBERT M · 2002 to 2002
$218k
CIRCULAR DICHROISM SPECTROPOLARIMETERS10RR013665 · NCRR · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI STRAUBINGER, ROBERT M · 1999 to 1999
–
NCRR NIH HHS S10-RR013665NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR015877NCRR NIH HHS S10-RR15877NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL070227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aggregation is a critical issue that hampers the development of monoclonal antibody therapeutics (Mabs). Traditionally, aggregation is considered a process in which native forms of proteins are transformed into an unstable highly associated form through an intermediate formation step. Here we describe the unfolding of an antiCD40 antibody using a folding model based on Lumry-Eyring nucleated polymerization (LENP) model. This model captures several experimental features of the thermal unfolding of this protein as studied by common in situ biophysical techniques such as circular dichroism, fluorescence spectroscopy, and turbidity measurements. According to this model, the unfolding and aggregation of the antiCD40 antibody is determined by several distinct steps that include conformational change(s) to generate aggregation prone states, reversible oligomer formation, nucleation and growth as well as their kinetics, and the formation of higher order assemblies/aggregates. Furthermore, the loss of monomer is controlled by both thermodynamic (equilibrium unfolding) and kinetic determinants of the unfolding process. This approach captures both of these rate-limiting steps. It can be concluded that this approach is sensitive to formulation conditions such as protein concentration, changes in buffer conditions, and temperature stress. The potential use of this approach in formulation development and stability testing of Mabs is discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalCD40 AntigensCircular DichroismDrug StabilityModels, ChemicalMurinaeProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProtein StabilitySpectrometry, FluorescenceSpectrophotometry, UltravioletTemperatureAntibodies, MonoclonalCD40 Antigens

Identifiers

PMID19798762
PMCPMC5119463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.