ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2010
Use of a folding model and in situ spectroscopic techniques for rational formulation development and stability testing of monoclonal antibody therapeutics.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A survey of FDA Approved Monoclonal Antibodies and Fc-fusion Proteins for Manufacturing Changes and Comparability Assessment.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Article
- A mechanistic marker-based screening tool to predict clinical immunogenicity of biologics.Communications medicine · 2023Article
- Molecular characterization of linker and loop-mediated structural modulation and hinge motion in the C4-C5 domains of cMyBPC.Journal of structural biology · 2022Article
- Immunogenicity Challenges Associated with Subcutaneous Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021Review
- Article
- Challenges and Opportunities for the Subcutaneous Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2018Review
- Why the Immune System Should Be Concerned by Nanomaterials?Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aggregation is a critical issue that hampers the development of monoclonal antibody therapeutics (Mabs). Traditionally, aggregation is considered a process in which native forms of proteins are transformed into an unstable highly associated form through an intermediate formation step. Here we describe the unfolding of an antiCD40 antibody using a folding model based on Lumry-Eyring nucleated polymerization (LENP) model. This model captures several experimental features of the thermal unfolding of this protein as studied by common in situ biophysical techniques such as circular dichroism, fluorescence spectroscopy, and turbidity measurements. According to this model, the unfolding and aggregation of the antiCD40 antibody is determined by several distinct steps that include conformational change(s) to generate aggregation prone states, reversible oligomer formation, nucleation and growth as well as their kinetics, and the formation of higher order assemblies/aggregates. Furthermore, the loss of monomer is controlled by both thermodynamic (equilibrium unfolding) and kinetic determinants of the unfolding process. This approach captures both of these rate-limiting steps. It can be concluded that this approach is sensitive to formulation conditions such as protein concentration, changes in buffer conditions, and temperature stress. The potential use of this approach in formulation development and stability testing of Mabs is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.