SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2010
An updating meta-analysis of the glutathione S-transferase T1 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: a HuGE review.
Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Individual and combined effects of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms on colorectal cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis.Bioscience reports · 2020Pooled it
- GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk in Chinese population: a meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2012Pooled it
- Serum vitamin C and other biomarkers differ by genotype of phase 2 enzyme genes GSTM1 and GSTT1.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2011Trial
- Article
- Deletion and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Common Glutathione-S Transferases Contribute to Colorectal Cancer Development.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2019Article
- Role of Glutathione S Transferase M1 and T1 Gene Polymorphism in Hepatitis B Related Liver Diseases and Cryptogenic Cirrhosis.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology · 2018Article
- The effect of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 polymorphisms on blood pressure, blood glucose, and lipid profiles following the supplementation of kale (Brassica oleracea acephala) juice in South Korean subclinical hypertensive patients.Nutrition research and practice · 2015Article
- Are centenarians genetically predisposed to lower disease risk?Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2012Article
- Genetics, cytogenetics, and epigenetics of colorectal cancer.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2011Review
- Genetic variations in human glutathione transferase enzymes: significance for pharmacology and toxicology.Human genomics and proteomics : HGP · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGSTT1 status has been extensively studied as a colorectal cancer risk factor. However, the results are inconsistent. To examine this controversy, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between GSTT1 polymorphism and colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a literature search using PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and HuGNet database to February 2009, with no restrictions. All articles were independent and contained the minimum information necessary to estimate the colorectal cancer risk associated with GSTT1 null. Summary odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effect or fixed-effect models based on the heterogeneity of included studies.
resultsA total of 23 case-control studies, including a total of 11,057 subjects (5,058 cases and 5,999 controls), that related to GSTT1 polymorphism and risk of colorectal cancer were identified and included for analysis. The random-effect meta-analyses of all the 23 studies suggested that there was a small increased risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with GSTT1 null (OR was 1.23; 95% CI 1.02-1.49; I (2) = 76.9%, P for heterogeneity <0.001). The fixed-effect meta-analyses reached a similar results in Caucasians populations of ten studies (OR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.21-1.59; I (2) = 29.8%, P for heterogeneity = 0.171) and Asians populations of five studies (OR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.04-1.45; I (2) = 0.0%, P for heterogeneity = 0.428), with as inversely association in the other ethnic populations from four studies (OR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.54-0.877; I (2) = 0.0%, P for heterogeneity = 0.58).
conclusionThere was a small increased risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with GSTT1 null, especially for Caucasians populations and Asian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19798506What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.