Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19798440›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2009

Public access to genome-wide data: five views on balancing research with privacy and protection.

P3G Consortium, George Church, Catherine Heeney, Naomi Hawkins, Jantina de Vries, Paula Boddington, Jane Kaye, Martin Bobrow, Bruce Weir

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Session Introduction: TOWARDS ETHICAL BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS: LEARNING FROM OLELO NOEAU, HAWAIIAN PROVERBS.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2023
    Article
  3. Controlling my genome with my smartphone: first clinical experiences of the PROMISE system.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sharing data for future research-engaging participants' views about data governance beyond the original project: a DIRECT Study.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  11. When Biology Gets Personal: Hidden Challenges of Privacy and Ethics in Biological Big Data.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Privacy in the Genomic Era.ACM computing surveys · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

P3G Consortium
George Church
Catherine Heeney
Naomi Hawkins
Jantina de Vries
Paula Boddington
Jane Kaye
Martin Bobrow
Bruce Weir

Funding

Theoretical Population Genetics SupplementR01GM075091 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WEIR, BRUCE S. · 2006 to 2020
$4.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 075091NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075091Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 077869/Z/05/ZWellcome Trust WT 081407/Z/06/ZWellcome Trust WT 083326/Z/07/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Access to InformationDatabases, GeneticGenome, HumanPrivacyConfidentialityGenetics, PopulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID19798440
PMCPMC2749921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.