Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19797614›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2009

A quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay for rapid, automated analysis of breast cancer sentinel lymph nodes.

Steven J Hughes, Liqiang Xi, William E Gooding, David J Cole, Michael Mitas, John Metcalf, Rohit Bhargava, David Dabbs, Jesus Ching, Lynn Kozma and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intraoperative qRT-PCR for detection of lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Steven J HughesDepartments of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 497 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. hughess2@upmc.edu
Liqiang Xi
William E Gooding
David J Cole
Michael Mitas
John Metcalf
Rohit Bhargava
David Dabbs
Jesus Ching
Lynn Kozma
William McMillan
Tony E Godfrey
3D Technology Laboratories (United States) · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Automated RNA Isolation and RT-PCR for Cancer DetectionR42CA099123 · NCI · CEPHEID · PI KOZMA, LYNN MARIE · 2003 to 2005
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA-01958NCI NIH HHS CA-099123NCI NIH HHS R42 CA099123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously reported that a quantitative reverse transcription (QRT)-PCR assay accurately analyzes sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to assess a completely automated, cartridge-based version of the assay for accuracy, predictive value, and reproducibility. The triplex (two markers + control) QRT-PCR assay was incorporated into a single-use cartridge for point-of-care use on the GeneXpert system. Three academic centers participated equally. Twenty-nine positive lymph nodes and 30 negative lymph nodes were analyzed to establish classification rules. SLNs from 120 patients were subsequently analyzed by QRT-PCR and histology (including immunohistochemistry), and the predetermined decision rules were used to classify the SLNs; 112 SLN specimens produced an informative result by both QRT-PCR and histology. By histological analysis, 21 SLNs were positive and 91 SLNs were negative for metastasis. QRT-PCR characterization produced a classification with 100% sensitivity, 97.8% specificity, and 98.2% accuracy compared with histology (91.3% positive predictive value and 100% negative predictive value). Interlaboratory reproducibility analyses demonstrated that a 95% prediction interval for a new measurement (DeltaCt) ranged between 0.403 and 0.956. This fully automated QRT-PCR assay accurately characterizes breast cancer SLNs for the presence of metastasis. Furthermore, the assay is not dependent on subjective interpretation, is reproducible across three clinical environments, and is rapid enough to allow intraoperative decision making.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID19797614
PMCPMC2765757
OpenAlexW2004345534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.