Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19794514›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2009

Predicting responders to therapies for multiple sclerosis.

Jordi Río, Manuel Comabella, Xavier Montalban

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guidelines on the clinical use for the detection of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to IFN beta in multiple sclerosis therapy: report from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Study group.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2014
    Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jordi RíoMultiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-120, Barcelona, Spain.
Manuel Comabella
Xavier Montalban
Hebron University · PSVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are only partially effective, and, in most patients receiving such treatment, clinical activity persists. Accurately assessing the treatment response to disease-modifying agents enables non-responder patients to be identified at an early stage into therapy. Patients can then be switched to another, potentially more effective, therapy before too much neurological damage has occurred. Several criteria based on relapses, disability progression or both have been proposed for clinical evaluation of the treatment response to disease-modifying agents. These criteria have not been independently validated, however, and no consensus over which are the best to use currently exists among investigators. MRI can also be employed to detect disease activity in patients treated with disease-modifying agents. Changes on MRI can provide subclinical data relating to disease activity that can be of great benefit in patients monitoring, as inflammatory events occur more often than clinical events. Pharmacogenomic approaches are in the early stages of development for MS, but hold great promise for the eventual development of individually tailored therapies. In this Review, we discuss the proposed approaches for monitoring and predicting treatment responses to disease-modifying agents in patients with RRMS. We evaluate the roles of clinical measures, MRI and pharmacogenomics in these processes.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsDisability EvaluationDisease ProgressionDrug ResistanceHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID19794514
OpenAlexW1991279381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.