Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19794082›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2009

A phase 2 study of vorinostat in acute myeloid leukemia.

Eric W Schaefer, Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla, Mark Juckett, John F DiPersio, Vivek Roy, James Slack, Wenting Wu, Kristina Laumann, Igor Espinoza-Delgado, Steven D Gore and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00305773 (A Phase 2 Study of Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00305773 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2 Study of Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (SAHA) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2006 to 2010Enrolled37ConditionsAdult Acute Erythroid Leukemia (M6), Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7), Adult Acute Minimally Differentiated Myeloid Leukemia (M0), Adult Acute Monoblastic Leukemia (M5a)Armsvorinostat
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy in leukemias.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Biology of Disease Relapse in Myeloid Disease: Implication for Strategies to Prevent and Treat Disease Relapse After Stem-Cell Transplantation.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eric W SchaeferMayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA.
Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla
Mark Juckett
John F DiPersio
Vivek Roy
James Slack
Wenting Wu
Kristina Laumann
Igor Espinoza-Delgado
Steven D Gore
Mayo P2C Phase II Consortium

Funding

Targeting Epigenomics in Myeloid NeoplasmsK24CA111717 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GORE, STEVEN D · 2005 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA111717NCI NIH HHS K24 CA111717-05NCI NIH HHS N01 CM17104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis two-stage, multi-institutional, randomized phase 2 trial assessed the toxicity and response rate associated with two treatment schedules of the histone deacetylase inhibitor, vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid; SAHA) in patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and in selected untreated patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia. DESIGN AND

methodsPatients with relapsed or untreated acute myeloid leukemia who were not candidates for chemotherapy entered one of the two treatment arms. In both arms a total dose of 8400 mg of vorinostat was delivered in each 21-day cycle of treatment: in arm A the dose regimen was 400 mg daily whereas in arm B the dose regimen was 200 mg three times daily for 14 days followed by 1 week rest.

resultsData from all 37 patients were used for the analyses. In arm A (n=15), the confirmed complete remission rate was 0% (95% CI, 0% to 23%); this arm was closed at the planned interim analysis. In arm B (n=22), the confirmed complete remission rate was 4.5% (1 response; 95% CI, 0.4% to 24%), with a duration of response exceeding 398 days. The median time to treatment failure in arm A was 42 days (95% CI, 26 to 57); although a minimum of four cycles of treatment were planned, 11 patients (79%) received no more than two cycles. The median time to treatment failure in arm B was 46 days (95% CI, 20 to 71); 13 patients (59%) received no more than two cycles of treatment.

conclusionsVorinostat monotherapy demonstrated minimal activity in this group of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Therapy was discontinued in many patients before the planned four cycles had been administered, either because of failure of vorinostat to control the leukocyte count or patients' and physicians' preference. Future studies of vorinostat in acute myeloid leukemia should focus on combinations with other drugs with which it might interact pharmacodynamically. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00305773.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansHydroxamic AcidsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedVorinostatHydroxamic AcidsVorinostat

Identifiers

PMID19794082
PMCPMC2754953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.