Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19794004›Full record

SynthesisDiabetes care2009

Statin therapy and risk of developing type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.

Swapnil N Rajpathak, Dharam J Kumbhani, Jill Crandall, Nir Barzilai, Michael Alderman, Paul M Ridker

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diabetes care, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02754739 (Effect of Pravastatin in the Subjects With Prediabetes or Early Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 163 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02754739 phase4completedstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Pravastatin in the Subjects With Prediabetes or Early Diabetes

Ran2014Enrolled44Registered outcomes10Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Prediabetic StateArmsNutritional education only, Placebo (for Pravastatin), pravastatin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Effects of Pitavastatin on Insulin Sensitivity and Liver Fat: A Randomized Clinical Trial.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2018
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Rosuvastatin Worsens Insulin Resistance in HIV-Infected Adults on Antiretroviral Therapy.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Combination of Policosanol (RaydelPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Swapnil N RajpathakDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health and Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York. srajpath@aecom.yu.edu
Dharam J Kumbhani
Jill Crandall
Nir Barzilai
Michael Alderman
Paul M Ridker

Funding

Stable Isotope and Metabolomics CoreP60DK020541 · NIDDK · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI PESSIN, JEFFREY E. · 1986 to 2014
$29.8M
TIME-DEPENDENT POTENTIATION OF INSULIN SECRETIONK08DK002054 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CALLE, ROBERTO A · 1991 to 1995
–
NIDDK NIH HHS 5P60DK2054NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK020541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough statin therapy reduces cardiovascular risk, its relationship with the development of diabetes is controversial. The first study (West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study [WOSCOPS]) that evaluated this association reported a small protective effect but used nonstandardized criteria for diabetes diagnosis. However, results from subsequent hypothesis-testing trials have been inconsistent. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the possible effect of statin therapy on incident diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA systematic literature search for randomized statin trials that reported data on diabetes through February 2009 was conducted using specific search terms. In addition to the hypothesis-generating data from WOSCOPS, hypothesis-testing data were available from the Heart Protection Study (HPS), the Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) Study, the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT), the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER), and the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Study in Heart Failure (CORONA), together including 57,593 patients with mean follow-up of 3.9 years during which 2,082 incident diabetes cases accrued. Weighted averages were reported as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity scores were assessed with the Q and I(2) statistic.

resultsIn the meta-analysis of the hypothesis-testing trials, we observed a small increase in diabetes risk (RR 1.13 [95% CI 1.03-1.23]) with no evidence of heterogeneity across trials. However, this estimate was attenuated and no longer significant when the hypothesis-generating trial WOSCOPS was included (1.06 [0.93-1.25]) and also resulted in significant heterogeneity (Q 11.8 [5 d.f.], P = 0.03, I(2) = 57.7%).

conclusionsAlthough statin therapy greatly lowers vascular risk, including among those with and at risk for diabetes, the relationship of statin therapy to incident diabetes remains uncertain. Future statin trials should be designed to formally address this issue.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID19794004
PMCPMC2752935

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.