Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19793801›Full record

ReviewCarcinogenesis2010

The human intra-S checkpoint response to UVC-induced DNA damage.

William K Kaufmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Carcinogenesis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Differential stability of DNA based on salt concentration.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mechanisms of chromosomal instability in melanoma.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

William K KaufmannDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Environmental Health and Susceptibility, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7295, USA. wkarlk@med.unc.edu
Center for Environmental Health · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
The System of Response to DNA Damage Suppresses Environmental MelanomagenesisP01ES014635 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAUFMANN, WILLIAM K. · 2007 to 2011
$6.7M
Cellular Responses to Environmental Insults and Risk for Melanoma DevelopmentR01ES015856 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CORDEIRO-STONE, MARILA · 2007 to 2011
$1.2M
S Checkpoint Function in Human FibroblastsR01ES011012 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAUFMANN, WILLIAM K · 2002 to 2004
$873k
NIEHS NIH HHS ES014635NIEHS NIH HHS ES015856NIEHS NIH HHS ES10126NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES014635NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES011012NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES015856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intra-S checkpoint response to 254 nm light (UVC)-induced DNA damage appears to have dual functions to slow the rate of DNA synthesis and stabilize replication forks that become stalled at sites of UVC-induced photoproducts in DNA. These functions should provide more time for repair of damaged DNA before its replication and thereby reduce the frequencies of mutations and chromosomal aberrations in surviving cells. This review tries to summarize the history of discovery of the checkpoint, the current state of understanding of the biological features of intra-S checkpoint signaling and its mechanisms of action with a focus primarily on intra-S checkpoint responses in human cells. The differences in the intra-S checkpoint responses to UVC and ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage are emphasized. Evidence that [6-4]pyrimidine-pyrimidone photoproducts in DNA trigger the response is discussed and the relationships between cellular responses to UVC and the molecular dose of UVC-induced DNA damage are briefly summarized. The role of the intra-S checkpoint response in protecting against solar radiation carcinogenesis remains to be determined.

Indexed as

DNA DamageUltraviolet RaysAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA RepairDNA ReplicationHumansProtein KinasesPyrimidine DimersRepliconSignal TransductionS PhaseCell Cycle ProteinsProtein KinasesPyrimidine Dimerspyrimidine-pyrimidone dimer

Identifiers

PMID19793801
PMCPMC2899860
OpenAlexW2154644976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.