Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19792034›Full record

ArticleChaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)2009

A simple sequential-binding model for calcium puffs.

D Swaminathan, G Ullah, P Jung

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Three-Dimensional Model of Sub-Plasmalemmal CaFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Three-Dimensional Model of Sub-Plasmalemmal CaFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D SwaminathanDepartment of Physics, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA.
G Ullah
P Jung

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium puffs describe the transient release of Ca(2+) ions into the cytosol, through small clusters of 1,4,5-inositol triphosphate (IP(3)) receptors, present on internal stores such as the endoplasmic reticulum. Statistical properties of puffs, such as puff amplitudes and durations, have been well characterized experimentally. We model calcium puffs using a simple, sequential-binding model for the IP(3) receptor in conjunction with a computationally inexpensive point-source approximation. We follow two different protocols, a sequential protocol and a renewal protocol. In the sequential protocol, puffs are generated successively by the same cluster; in the renewal protocol, the system is reset after each puff. In both cases for a single set of parameters our results are in excellent agreement with experimental results for puff amplitudes and durations but indicate puff-to-puff correlations for the sequential protocol, consistent with recent experimental findings [H. J. Rose, S. Dargan, J. W. Shuai, and I. Parker, Biophys. J. 91, 4024 (2006)]. The model is then used to test the consistency of the hypothesized steep Ca(2+) gradients around single channels with the experimentally observed features of puff durations and amplitudes. A three-dimensional implementation of our point-source model suggests that a peak Ca(2+) concentration of the order of 10 muM at the cluster site (not channel) is consistent with the statistical features of observed calcium puffs.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNonlinear DynamicsAlgorithmsAnimalsBiological ClocksCalcium ChannelsCalcium SignalingComputer SimulationHumansInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsIon Channel GatingModels, StatisticalOscillometryCalcium ChannelsInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptors

Identifiers

PMID19792034
PMCPMC2826368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.