ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2009
Structure and thermodynamics of colloidal protein cluster formation: comparison of square-well and simple dipolar models.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of anisotropic interactions for proteins and patchy nanoparticles.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2014Article
- Coarse-grained model for colloidal protein interactions, B(22), and protein cluster formation.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2013Article
- Antibody nanoparticle dispersions formed with mixtures of crowding molecules retain activity and in vivo bioavailability.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2012Article
- Electrostatics and aggregation: how charge can turn a crystal into a gel.The Journal of chemical physics · 2011Article
- Increase in surface hydrophobicity of the cataract-associated P23T mutant of human gammaD-crystallin is responsible for its dramatically lower, retrograde solubility.Biochemistry · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reversible formation of weakly associated protein oligomers or clusters is a key early step in processes such as protein aggregation and colloidal phase separation. A previously developed cell-based, quasichemical model for lattice fluids [T. M. Young and C. J. Roberts, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 165101 (2007)] is extended here to treat continuous-space systems. It is illustrated using two simplified limiting cases for globular proteins at the isoelectric point: spherical square-well (SW) particles with an isotropic short-ranged attraction and screened dipolar particles with SW attractions and square-shoulder repulsions. Cluster free energies (DeltaA(i)) and structures are analyzed as a function of the reduced second virial coefficient b(2)(*). DeltaA(i) values and the average structures of clusters up to pentamers have distinct differences due to the anisotropic nature of the dipolar interactions. However, DeltaA(i) values can be mapped semiquantitatively between the two cases if compared at common values of b(2)(*). Free energy landscapes of oligomerization are constructed, illustrating significant differences in landscape ruggedness for small clusters of dipolar versus SW fluids, and suggesting a possible molecular interpretation for empirical models of nucleation-dependent aggregation of proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.