Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19789641›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

A microscope automated fluidic system to study bacterial processes in real time.

Adrien Ducret, Etienne Maisonneuve, Philippe Notareschi, Alain Grossi, Tâm Mignot, Sam Dukan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbial single-cell applications under anoxic conditions.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adrien DucretAix Marseille Université, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne (UPR 9043), Institut de Microbiologie de la Méditerranée (IFR 88), CNRS, 31, Chemin Joseph Aiguier, Marseille, France.
Etienne Maisonneuve
Philippe Notareschi
Alain Grossi
Tâm Mignot
Sam Dukan
Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Microbiologie de la Méditerranée · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most time lapse microscopy experiments studying bacterial processes ie growth, progression through the cell cycle and motility have been performed on thin nutrient agar pads. An important limitation of this approach is that dynamic perturbations of the experimental conditions cannot be easily performed. In eukaryotic cell biology, fluidic approaches have been largely used to study the impact of rapid environmental perturbations on live cells and in real time. However, all these approaches are not easily applicable to bacterial cells because the substrata are in all cases specific and also because microfluidics nanotechnology requires a complex lithography for the study of micrometer sized bacterial cells. In fact, in many cases agar is the experimental solid substratum on which bacteria can move or even grow. For these reasons, we designed a novel hybrid micro fluidic device that combines a thin agar pad and a custom flow chamber. By studying several examples, we show that this system allows real time analysis of a broad array of biological processes such as growth, development and motility. Thus, the flow chamber system will be an essential tool to study any process that take place on an agar surface at the single cell level.

Indexed as

AgarAutomationBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaCell Culture TechniquesCell CycleEquipment DesignEscherichia coliMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidicsMicroscopyMyxococcusNanotechnologyAgar

Identifiers

PMID19789641
PMCPMC2748647
OpenAlexW2029051828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.