Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19789275›Full record

ReviewThe Plant cell2009

Lights, rhythms, infection: the role of light and the circadian clock in determining the outcome of plant-pathogen interactions.

Laura C Roden, Robert A Ingle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant cell, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Plant signaling & behavior · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Part-night exposure to artificial light at night has more detrimental effects on aphid colonies than fully lit nights.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Red and Blue Light Differently InfluenceInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Photoperiod Stress inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura C RodenDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7701 Cape Town, South Africa. laura.roden@uct.ac.za
Robert A Ingle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of light with respect to the outcome of plant-pathogen interactions is becoming increasingly evident: light affects both the host response and the virulence of some pathogens. The response of plants to environmental signals and stresses is modulated by the circadian clock, and it is apparent that this may include immune responses. Photo and temporal regulation of immune responses may allow plants to anticipate and react more effectively to particular pathogen infections. These aspects of regulation are sometimes overlooked when designing experiments to understand plant-pathogen interactions, complicating the interpretation of the outcomes and the direct comparisons of studies. We review recent key findings in these areas and discuss the implications for experimental design and analyses.

Indexed as

Biological ClocksCircadian RhythmHost-Pathogen InteractionsLightGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant DiseasesPlants

Identifiers

PMID19789275
PMCPMC2768925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.