Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19788736›Full record

Trial reportTrials2009

A randomized, controlled, prospective trial to evaluate the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt versus Surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis: "COBBANA" trial.

Petra Baumann, Hardy Schumacher, Johannes Hüsing, Steffen Luntz, Hanns-Peter Knaebel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00837954 (Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Trial to Evaluate the Hemostatic Effect of Lyostypt® Versus Surgicel® in Arterial Bypass Anastomosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00837954 phase4completednot on this map

Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Trial to Evaluate the Hemostatic Effect of Lyostypt® Versus Surgicel® in Arterial Bypass Anastomosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAesculap AGRan2009 to 2010Enrolled32ConditionsPeripheral Vascular Diseases, HemostasisArmsLyostypt® AND Surgicel®, Lyostypt®, Surgicel®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for treating post-extraction bleeding.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Petra BaumannAesculap AG, Department of Clinical Science, Am Aesculap Platz, 78532 Tuttlingen, Germany. petra.baumann@aesculap.de
Hardy Schumacher
Johannes Hüsing
Steffen Luntz
Hanns-Peter Knaebel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of suture hole bleeding at peripheral arterial bypass anastomoses using PTFE graft prostheses is a common problem in peripheral vascular surgery. Traditionally the problem is managed by compression with surgical swabs and reversal heparin or by using several haemostatic device (e.g. different forms of collagen, oxidized cellulose, gelatine sponge, ethylcyanoacrylate glue or fibrin) with various success. Preclinical data suggest that the haemostatic effect of collagen is stronger than that of oxidized cellulose, but no direct clinical comparison of their hemostatic performance has been published so far.

designThis randomized, controlled, prospective trial evaluates the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt versus Surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis. 28 patients undergoing an elective peripheral vascular reconstruction due to peripheral vascular disease will be included. Suture hole bleeding occurring at the arterial bypass anastomosis using a PTFE prostheses will be stopped by the application of Lyostypt and/or Surgicel. The proximal anastomoses will be randomized intraoperatively. The patients will be allocated into 4 different treatment groups. Group1 Lyostypt distal/Surgicel proximal; Group 2: Lyostypt proximal/Surgicel distal; Group 3: Surgicel distal and proximal; Group 4: Lyostypt distal and proximal. Primary endpoint of the study is time to haemostasis. Secondary endpoints are the number of intraoperatively used haemostatic devices, postoperative mortality within 30 days as well as the intraoperative efficacy rating of the two devices evaluated by the surgeon. As a safety secondary parameter, the local and general complication occurring till 30 +/- 10 days postoperatively will also be analysed. After hospital discharge the investigator will examine the enrolled patients again at 30 days after surgery. DISCUSSION: The COBBANA trial aims to assess, whether the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt is superior to Surgicel in suture hole bleedings of arterial bypass anastomoses.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationCellulose, OxidizedCollagenHemostaticsHumansPeripheral Vascular DiseasesPolytetrafluoroethyleneProspective StudiesSuturesCellulose, OxidizedCollagenHemostaticsPolytetrafluoroethylene

Identifiers

PMID19788736
PMCPMC2760543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.