ArticleBiology direct2009
Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things.
Article in Biology direct, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
83 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconstructing the Network of Horizontal Gene Exchange in Bacteria to Differentiate Direct and Indirect Transfers.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- A new symbiotic, holistic and gradualist model proposal for the concept of "living organism".Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2025Article
- Analyzing microbial evolution through gene and genome phylogenies.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Population genomics and morphological data bridge the centuries of cyanobacterial taxonomy along the continuum ofiScience · 2024Article
- Epistemology of synthetic biology: a new theoretical framework based on its potential objects and objectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Realistic Gene Transfer to Gene Duplication Ratios Identify Different Roots in the Bacterial Phylogeny Using a Tree Reconciliation Method.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Old genes in new places: A taxon-rich analysis of interdomain lateral gene transfer events.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Hundreds of Out-of-Frame Remodeled Gene Families in the Escherichia coli Pangenome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- An Efficient, Nonphylogenetic Method for Detecting Genes Sharing Evolutionary Signals in Phylogenomic Data Sets.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Evolution of Microbial Genomics: Conceptual Shifts over a Quarter Century.Trends in microbiology · 2021Review
- Ancient Antibiotics, Ancient Resistance.EcoSal Plus · 2021Review
- Diversity within species: interpreting strains in microbiomes.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2020Review
- Large-scale network analysis captures biological features of bacterial plasmids.Nature communications · 2020Article
- The Genome of the Fungal Pathogen Verticillium dahliae Reveals Extensive Bacterial to Fungal Gene Transfer.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- An Expanded Ribosomal Phylogeny of Cyanobacteria Supports a Deep Placement of Plastids.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Article
- Exclusivity offers a sound yet practical species criterion for bacteria despite abundant gene flow.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Causality in Biological Transmission: Forces and Energies.Microbiology spectrum · 2018Review
- Towards a Dynamic Interaction Network of Life to unify and expand the evolutionary theory.BMC biology · 2018Review
- Article
23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe concept of a tree of life is prevalent in the evolutionary literature. It stems from attempting to obtain a grand unified natural system that reflects a recurrent process of species and lineage splittings for all forms of life. Traditionally, the discipline of systematics operates in a similar hierarchy of bifurcating (sometimes multifurcating) categories. The assumption of a universal tree of life hinges upon the process of evolution being tree-like throughout all forms of life and all of biological time. In multicellular eukaryotes, the molecular mechanisms and species-level population genetics of variation do indeed mainly cause a tree-like structure over time. In prokaryotes, they do not. Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things, and we need to treat them as such, rather than extrapolating from macroscopic life to prokaryotes. In the following we will consider this circumstance from philosophical, scientific, and epistemological perspectives, surmising that phylogeny opted for a single model as a holdover from the Modern Synthesis of evolution.
resultsIt was far easier to envision and defend the concept of a universal tree of life before we had data from genomes. But the belief that prokaryotes are related by such a tree has now become stronger than the data to support it. The monistic concept of a single universal tree of life appears, in the face of genome data, increasingly obsolete. This traditional model to describe evolution is no longer the most scientifically productive position to hold, because of the plurality of evolutionary patterns and mechanisms involved. Forcing a single bifurcating scheme onto prokaryotic evolution disregards the non-tree-like nature of natural variation among prokaryotes and accounts for only a minority of observations from genomes.
conclusionProkaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things. Hence we will briefly set out alternative models to the tree of life to study their evolution. Ultimately, the plurality of evolutionary patterns and mechanisms involved, such as the discontinuity of the process of evolution across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide, summons forth a pluralistic approach to studying evolution. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Ford Doolittle, John Logsdon and Nicolas Galtier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.