Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19788432›Full record

ReviewDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2010

Managing women with gestational diabetes mellitus in the postnatal period.

Catherine Kim

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Barriers to Postpartum Glucose Intolerance Screening in an Italian Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New criteria for gestational diabetes in Tehran, Iran.Iranian journal of reproductive medicine · 2012
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Missed opportunities for diabetes prevention: post-pregnancy follow-up of women with gestational diabetes mellitus in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine KimDepartments of Medicine and Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. cathkim@umich.edu
Michigan Medicine · US

Funding

Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Women With Gestational DiabetesK23DK071552 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KIM, CATHERINE · 2006 to 2010
$674k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK071552NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK071552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines for management of women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in the postpregnancy period have lagged behind the recognition that this is an important time for medical intervention. However, in the past decade, the evidence-base for screening algorithms, contraceptive management, diabetes prevention strategies and implications for offspring has expanded. In this review, we discuss current recommendations for managing women with GDM in the postnatal period, with particular attention to postpartum diabetes screening, prevention of future glucose intolerance and family planning.

Indexed as

Postpartum PeriodDiabetes, GestationalEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleGlucose IntoleranceGlucose Tolerance TestGuideline AdherenceHumansMass ScreeningPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID19788432
PMCPMC4139039
OpenAlexW2113499386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.