Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19787323›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2009

[Motivation for physical activity - a survey in a Central European state].

Florian Wepner, Julia Hahne, Peter Machacek, Jörg Holzapfel, Martin Friedrich

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florian WepnerCeops (Center of Excellence for Orthopaedic Painmanagement Speising), Orthopädisches Spital Speising, Wien, Osterreich. florian.wepner@ceops.at
Julia Hahne
Peter Machacek
Jörg Holzapfel
Martin Friedrich

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhysical activity has high importance in the prevention of diseases, particularly where lifestyle diseases are concerned. To motivate a person to be physically active often proves to be difficult in clinical practice. Thus it was the aim of this study to find out through interviews how to best motivate most notably the part of the population that is less active.

methods500 persons aged from 15 years onwards were asked in face-to-face interviews about their leisure activities, self-assessment of their personal fitness, and about inhibiting and motivating factors in connection with their physical activity.

resultsOnly every second interviewed person is intentionally active in order to improve his/her own fitness. The better part of the inactive population can envisage introducing more physical activity into their everyday life. There are various reasons that instigate to be more active: above all, the recommendation of doctors, but also the wish for physical wellbeing or group dynamics act as a stimulant. Would there be an advertising campaign promoting the importance of physical activity, top athletes and physicians would have the most motivating impact.

conclusionA sustainable and favourable effect on health promotion could be achieved most notably by motivating people to add more physical activity to their everyday life.

Indexed as

Health StatusLeisure ActivitiesMotivationPhysical FitnessAdultAustriaFemaleHealth SurveysHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.