Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19786596›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009

Introduction of ertapenem into a hospital formulary: effect on antimicrobial usage and improved in vitro susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Ellie J C Goldstein, Diane M Citron, Victoria Peraino, Tanya Elgourt, Anne R Meibohm, Shuang Lu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Carbapenem stewardship with ertapenem and antimicrobial resistance-a scoping review.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2020
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ellie J C GoldsteinRM Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica, California 90404, USA. ejcgmd@aol.com
Diane M Citron
Victoria Peraino
Tanya Elgourt
Anne R Meibohm
Shuang Lu
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USSaint John's Health Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After ertapenem was added to the formulary of a 344-bed community teaching hospital, we retrospectively studied its effect on antimicrobial utilization and on the in vitro susceptibility of various antimicrobial agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Three study periods were defined as preintroduction (months 1 to 9), postintroduction but before the autosubstitution of ertapenem for ampicillin-sulbactam (months 10 to 18), and after the policy of autosubstitution (months 19 to 48) was initiated. Ertapenem usage rose slowly from introduction to a range of 36 to 48 defined daily doses/1,000 patient days (DDD) with a resultant decrease in ampicillin-sulbactam usage due to autosubstitution. Imipenem usage peaked 6 months after the introduction of ertapenem and started to decline coincidently with the increased use of ertapenem. During the second period, imipenem usage decreased (slope = -1.28; P = 0.002). Prior to the introduction of ertapenem, the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to imipenem increased from 61 to 81% at month 7 but then decreased slightly to 67% at month 9. After the introduction of ertapenem, susceptibility continued to increase; the increasing trend was significant (slope = 1.74; P < 0.001). In the third period, the median susceptibility (interquartile range) was 88% (82 to 95%). This change appeared related to decreased imipenem usage. For every unit decrease in the monthly DDD of imipenem, there was an increase of 0.38% (P = 0.008) in the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to imipenem in the same month. Ertapenem was effective in our antimicrobial stewardship program and may have helped improve the P. aeruginosa antimicrobial susceptibility to imipenem by decreasing the unnecessary usage and selective pressure of antipseudomonal agents.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsFormularies, Hospital as TopicAmpicillinbeta-LactamsErtapenemHumansImipenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsRetrospective StudiesSulbactamAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsErtapenemImipenemSulbactamsultamicillin

Identifiers

PMID19786596
PMCPMC2786360
OpenAlexW2160197952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.