ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2009
The NO donor DETA-NONOate reversibly activates an inward current in neurones and is not mediated by the released nitric oxide.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nitric oxide modulates contrast suppression in a subset of mouse retinal ganglion cells.eLife · 2025Article
- GSNOR overexpression enhances CAR-T cell stemness and anti-tumor function by enforcing mitochondrial fitness.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Article
- The Impact of LY487379 or CDPPB on eNOS Expression in the Mouse Brain and the Effect of Joint Administration of Compounds with NOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Nitric Oxide Mobilizes Intracellular ZnInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Recent Developments in Pharmacological Effect, Mechanism and Application Prospect of Diazeniumdiolates.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Pharmacological manipulation of cGMP and NO/cGMP in CNS drug discovery.Nitric oxide : biology and chemistry · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeIt has been previously shown that high levels of nitric oxide (NO), from NO donors, kill neurones, but the mechanisms are unclear. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of NO donors on the electrical properties of rat cultured cerebellar granule cells (CGC neurones) were investigated using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. KEY
resultsThe NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl)amino]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA-NONOate or NOC-18) caused a rapid, persistent, but fully reversible inward current that was associated with an increase in baseline noise and was concentration dependent (100 microM-10 mM). The response to 3 mM DETA-NONOate was completely inhibited by 1 mM gadolinium, but not by NO scavengers (1 mM haemoglobin or 1 mM PTIO) or glutamate receptor antagonists (10 microM MK-801 or 60 microM CNQX). Application of decomposed 3 mM DETA-NONOate or 3 mM nitrite had no effect. In contrast, the NO donor S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) caused a rapid, persistent, but fully reversible outward current that was also concentration dependent (1-10 mM). The 3 mM GSNO response was unaltered by NO scavengers, glutamate antagonists or gadolinium, but was mimicked by decomposed 3 mM GSNO and 3 mM oxidized glutathione. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest that DETA-NONOate directly activates cation-selective channels, causing an inward current in CGCs. In contrast, GSNO causes an outward current in these cells. Some of the effects of these NO donors are independent of NO, and thus caution is required in interpreting results when using high concentrations of these compounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.