Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19785622›Full record

ReviewAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2010

Review article: new receptor targets for medical therapy in irritable bowel syndrome.

M Camilleri

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pilot trial: pregabalin on colonic sensorimotor functions in irritable bowel syndrome.Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · 2014
    Trial
  2. Effect of the α2δ ligand, pregabalin, on colonic sensory and motor functions in healthy adults.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2011
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Impact of psychological stress on irritable bowel syndrome.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The gut as a sensory organ.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013
    Article
  18. Linaclotide.Hospital pharmacy · 2013
    Article
  19. New treatments for IBS.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M CamilleriClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (C.E.N.T.E.R.), College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. camilleri.michael@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

ALPHA 2 ADRENERGIC CONTROL OF COLONIC FUNCTION IN IBSR01DK054681 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CAMILLERI, MICHAEL L · 1999 to 2007
$1.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK054681NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK-54681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite setbacks to the approval of new medications for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, interim guidelines on endpoints for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) trials have enhanced interest as new targets for medical therapy are proposed based on novel mechanisms or chemical entities.

aimsTo review the approved lubiprostone, two targets that are not meeting expectations (tachykinins and corticotrophin-releasing hormone), the efficacy and safety of new 5-HT(4) agonists, intestinal secretagogues (chloride channel activators, and guanylate cyclase-C agonists), bile acid modulation, anti-inflammatory agents and visceral analgesics.

methodsReview of selected articles based on PubMed search and clinically relevant information on mechanism of action, safety, pharmacodynamics and efficacy.

resultsThe spectrum of peripheral targets of medical therapy addresses chiefly the bowel dysfunction of IBS and these effects are associated with pain relief. The pivotal mechanisms responsible for the abdominal pain or visceral sensation in IBS are unknown. The new 5-HT(4) agonists are more specific than older agents and show cardiovascular safety to date. Secretory agents have high specificity, low bioavailability and high efficacy. The potential risks of agents 'borrowed' from other indications (such as hyperlipidaemia, inflammatory bowel disease or somatic pain) deserve further study.

conclusionsThere is reason for optimism in medical treatment of IBS with a spectrum of agents to treat bowel dysfunction. However, visceral analgesic treatments are still suboptimal.

Indexed as

AlprostadilBileGastrointestinal MotilityHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeLubiprostoneQuality of LifeReceptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3Serotonin Receptor AgonistsTreatment OutcomeAlprostadilLubiprostoneReceptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3Serotonin Receptor Agonists

Identifiers

PMID19785622
PMCPMC2896496
OpenAlexW1965196624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.