ArticleHeart and vessels2009
Long-term prognostic value of coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: 9-year follow-up results from SZEGED study.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Survival and prognostic factors in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathies: An In-Depth Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic strategies across cardiovascular diseases.EXCLI journal · 2025Review
- Microcirculatory dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with chest pain assessed by angiography-derived microcirculatory resistance.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors for Related Complications of Chemical Ablation on Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reduction in coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) is a recognized feature in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We sought to assess the long-term prognostic value of CFR by pulsed-wave Doppler transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in HCM patients. The study comprised 20 patients with typical features of HCM. The patients were enrolled in 1999. All patients underwent a standard transthoracic echo-Doppler study to evaluate left ventricular function and a stress vasodilator TEE study to evaluate CFR. The success rate of follow-up was 18 out of 20 (90%). During a mean follow-up of 90 +/- 24 months, four patients suffered cardiovascular death (2 sudden cardiac deaths and 2 strokes). The other seven patients underwent invasive procedures (coronary angiography, implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation) or showed cerebrovascular events. Using receiver operator characteristic analysis, CFR < 2.35 was a significant predictor for cardiovascular event-free survival (sensitivity 91%, specificity 71%, area under the curve 74%, P = 0.05). Multivariable regression analysis showed that only CFR (hazard ratio (HR) 4.21, P < 0.05) was an independent predictor of cardiovascular event-free survival. Despite the relatively small number of patients involved in the study, results could suggest that CFR should be considered as an independent predictor for future cardiovascular events in HCM patients. However, further studies with larger HCM patient populations are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19784818What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.