Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19784390›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2009

Immunohistochemical study of pig retinal development.

Jasenka Guduric-Fuchs, Laura J Ringland, Ping Gu, Margaret Dellett, Desmond B Archer, Tiziana Cogliati

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pig Models in Retinal Research and Retinal Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Basolateral activation with TLR agonists induces polarized cytokine release and reduces barrier function in RPE in vitro.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Organ Cultures for Retinal Diseases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jasenka Guduric-FuchsCentre for Vision and Vascular Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom. j.guduricfuchs@qub.ac.uk
Laura J Ringland
Ping Gu
Margaret Dellett
Desmond B Archer
Tiziana Cogliati
Queen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe pig eye is similar to the human eye in terms of anatomy, vasculature, and photoreceptor distribution, and therefore provides an attractive animal model for research into retinal disease. The purpose of this study was to characterize retinal histology in the developing and mature pig retina using antibodies to well established retinal cell markers commonly used in rodents.

methodsEyes were enucleated from fetuses in the 9th week of gestation, 1 week old piglets and 6 months old adult animals. Eyeglobes were fixed and cryosectioned. A panel of antibodies to well established retinal markers was employed for immunohistochemistry. Fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies were used for signal detection, and images were acquired by confocal microscopy. Mouse retina at postnatal day (P) 5 was used as a reference for this study to compare progression of histogenesis. Most of the primary antibodies have previously been used on mouse tissue.

resultsMost of the studied markers were detected in midgestation pig retina, and the majority had a similar distribution in pig as in P5 mouse retina. However, rhodopsin immunolabeling was detected in pig retina at midgestation but not in P5 mouse retina. Contrary to findings in all rodents, horizontal cells were Islet1-positive and cones were calbindin-immunoreactive in pig retina, as has also been shown for the primate retina. Recoverin and rhodopsin immunolabeling revealed an increase in the length of photoreceptor segments in 6 months, compared to 1 week old animals.

conclusionsComparison with the published data on human retina revealed similar marker distribution and histogenesis progression in the pig and human retina, supporting the pig as a valuable animal model for studies on retinal disease and repair. Furthermore, this study provides information about the dynamics of retinal histogenesis in the pig and validates a panel of antibodies that reliably detects developing and mature retinal cell phenotypes in the pig retina.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCalbindin 2CalbindinsCryoultramicrotomyEye ProteinsGlutamate DecarboxylaseHomeodomain ProteinsImmunohistochemistryIntermediate Filament ProteinsKi-67 AntigenLIM-Homeodomain ProteinsMiceModels, AnimalNerve Tissue ProteinsNestinBiomarkersCalbindin 2CalbindinsEye ProteinsGlutamate Decarboxylaseglutamate decarboxylase 2Homeodomain Proteinsinsulin gene enhancer binding protein Isl-1Intermediate Filament ProteinsKi-67 AntigenLIM-Homeodomain ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNES protein, humanNes protein, mouseNestinNuclear ProteinsPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX6 protein, humanPax6 protein, mousePAX6 Transcription FactorProtein Kinase C-alphaRepressor ProteinsS100 Calcium Binding Protein GTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19784390
PMCPMC2751799
OpenAlexW2153055063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.