Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19780044›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2010

Comparing 3 T and 1.5 T MRI for tracking Alzheimer's disease progression with tensor-based morphometry.

April J Ho, Xue Hua, Suh Lee, Alex D Leow, Igor Yanovsky, Boris Gutman, Ivo D Dinov, Natasha Leporé, Jason L Stein, Arthur W Toga and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Contributions of the ADNI Biostatistics Core.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

April J HoLaboratory of Neuro Imaging, Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095-1769., USA.
Xue Hua
Suh Lee
Alex D Leow
Igor Yanovsky
Boris Gutman
Ivo D Dinov
Natasha Leporé
Jason L Stein
Arthur W Toga
Clifford R Jack
Matt A Bernstein
Eric M Reiman
Danielle J Harvey
John Kornak
Norbert Schuff
Gene E Alexander
Michael W Weiner
Paul M Thompson
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
RECRUITMENT COREU19AG010483 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FELDMAN, HOWARD · 2013 to 2020
$80.6M
ZDV &3TC NEVIRAPINE COMBINATION THERAPY IN HIV 1 INFECTED INFANTS &M01RR000865 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WASHINGTON, ARNOLD E. · 1985 to 2011
$43.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG019610 · NIA · SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2001 to 2020
$32.5M
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG010129 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI DECARLI, CHARLES · 1991 to 2020
$28.3M
UCLA ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG016570 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GRILL, JOSHUA · 1999 to 2014
$25.9M
Center for Computational Biology (RMI)U54RR021813 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 2004 to 2010
$25.3M
YALE CENTER FOR THE: LEARNING &ATTENTIONP41RR013642 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GEE, JAMES C · 1998 to 2011
$21.9M
Predictors of Alheimers Disease in Mild Cognitive ImpairmentR01AG020098 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LOPEZ, OSCAR L. · 2002 to 2011
$3.7M
HARDI Mapping of Disease Effects on the BrainR01EB008432 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI THOMPSON, PAUL M · 2009 to 2012
$2.6M
Genetic influences on the brain: A twin imaging studyR01HD050735 · NICHD · QUEENSLAND INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI WRIGHT, MARGARET JANE · 2007 to 2011
$2.6M
DIGITAL REPRESENTATION AND VISUALIZATION OF HUMAN BRAINR01LM005639 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 1995 to 2005
$1.8M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000865NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR013642NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR019771NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR021813NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010129NIA NIH HHS P30 AG019610NIA NIH HHS P50 AG016570NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020098NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U01AG024904NIA NIH HHS U19 AG010483NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007813NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB008281NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB008432NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD050735NLM NIH HHS R01 LM005639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key question in designing MRI-based clinical trials is how the main magnetic field strength of the scanner affects the power to detect disease effects. In 110 subjects scanned longitudinally at both 3.0 and 1.5 T, including 24 patients with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) [74.8 +/- 9.2 years, MMSE: 22.6 +/- 2.0 at baseline], 51 individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) [74.1 +/- 8.0 years, MMSE: 26.6 +/- 2.0], and 35 controls [75.9 +/- 4.6 years, MMSE: 29.3 +/- 0.8], we assessed whether higher-field MR imaging offers higher or lower power to detect longitudinal changes in the brain, using tensor-based morphometry (TBM) to reveal the location of progressive atrophy. As expected, at both field strengths, progressive atrophy was widespread in AD and more spatially restricted in MCI. Power analysis revealed that, to detect a 25% slowing of atrophy (with 80% power), 37 AD and 108 MCI subjects would be needed at 1.5 T versus 49 AD and 166 MCI subjects at 3 T; however, the increased power at 1.5 T was not statistically significant (alpha = 0.05) either for TBM, or for SIENA, a related method for computing volume loss rates. Analysis of cumulative distribution functions and false discovery rates showed that, at both field strengths, temporal lobe atrophy rates were correlated with interval decline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), mini-mental status exam (MMSE), and Clinical Dementia Rating sum-of-boxes (CDR-SB) scores. Overall, 1.5 and 3 T scans did not significantly differ in their power to detect neurodegenerative changes over a year. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseBrainCognition DisordersDiffusion Tensor ImagingDisease ProgressionFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLongitudinal StudiesMaleSeverity of Illness IndexTemporal LobeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID19780044
PMCPMC2875376
OpenAlexW2056722579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.