Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19778853›Full record

ReviewClinical lymphoma & myeloma2009

Minimal residual disease quantitation in acute myeloid leukemia.

David Shook, Elaine Coustan-Smith, Raul C Ribeiro, Jeffrey E Rubnitz, Dario Campana

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical lymphoma & myeloma, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Effects of dendritic cell-activated and cytokine-induced killer cell therapy on 22 children with acute myeloid leukemia after chemotherapy.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2015
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Detection of minimal residual disease in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia by next-generation sequencing.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2014
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative analysis of different approaches to measure treatment response in acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2012
    Article
  10. Minimal residual disease.Leukemia supplements · 2012
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David ShookDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105-3678, USA.
Elaine Coustan-Smith
Raul C Ribeiro
Jeffrey E Rubnitz
Dario Campana
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
LABORATORY TRAINING FOR CLINICAL ONCOLOGISTST32CA070089 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI DOWNING, JAMES R · 1996 to 2011
$3.7M
Clinical Significance of Residual Myeloid LeukemiaR01CA115422 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CAMPANA, DARIO · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA115422NCI NIH HHS CA21765NCI NIH HHS CA70089NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS R01 CA115422NCI NIH HHS T32 CA070089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognosis for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is heterogeneous. A minority of patients have clinical and biologic features associated with a very high risk of relapse. For the remaining patients, no clear prognostic factors can be identified at diagnosis. The degree of treatment response is likely to be an informative predictor of outcome for these patients. Modern assays to detect AML cells that are undetectable by conventional morphologic techniques, ie, minimal residual disease (MRD), can potentially improve measurements of treatment response. It is plausible that modifications to treatment based on the results of these assays will improve clinical management and ultimately increase cure rates. Established MRD assays for AML are based on either polymerase chain reaction amplification of genetic abnormalities or flow cytometric detection of abnormal immunophenotypes. Residual disease and treatment response can be measured by these assays in a manner that is much more sensitive and objective than that afforded by conventional morphologic examination. The expanding use of MRD testing is beginning to change the definitions of treatment response and of remission. Other clinically informative uses of MRD testing include the detection of early relapse and the evaluation of the efficacy of new antileukemic agents.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorFlow CytometryHumansImmunophenotypingLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMedical OncologyNeoplasm, ResidualPolymerase Chain ReactionPrognosisRiskTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID19778853
PMCPMC2785493
OpenAlexW2103152434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.