Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19778532›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental biology2010

Morphogenesis of epithelial tubes: Insights into tube formation, elongation, and elaboration.

Deborah J Andrew, Andrew J Ewald

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 185 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
185citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

185 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 347 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Morphogenic colloids.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. The dynamics of tubulogenesis in development and disease.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. TheProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. The Enigmas of Tissue Closure: Inspiration fromCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Shaping epithelial lumina under pressure.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024
    Review
  20. Breaking the symmetry of cell contractility drives tubulogenesis via CXCL1 polarization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article

125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deborah J AndrewDepartment of Cell Biology and Center for Cell Dynamics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Andrew J Ewald
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

FORMATION OF THE DROSOPHILA SALIVARY GLANDR01DE013899 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Deborah J Andrew · 2001 to 2026
$11.2M
TRACHEALESS AND EMBRYONIC TUBE FORMATIONR01DE012873 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANDREW, DEBORAH J · 1999 to 2015
$5.2M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE012873NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial tubes are a fundamental tissue across the metazoan phyla and provide an essential functional component of many of the major organs. Recent work in flies and mammals has begun to elucidate the cellular mechanisms driving the formation, elongation, and branching morphogenesis of epithelial tubes during development. Both forward and reverse genetic techniques have begun to identify critical molecular regulators for these processes and have revealed the conserved role of key pathways in regulating the growth and elaboration of tubular networks. In this review, we discuss the developmental programs driving the formation of branched epithelial networks, with specific emphasis on the trachea and salivary gland of Drosophila melanogaster and the mammalian lung, mammary gland, kidney, and salivary gland. We both highlight similarities in the development of these organs and attempt to identify tissue and organism specific strategies. Finally, we briefly consider how our understanding of the regulation of proliferation, apicobasal polarity, and epithelial motility during branching morphogenesis can be applied to understand the pathologic dysregulation of these same processes during metastatic cancer progression.

Indexed as

MorphogenesisOrganogenesisAnimalsBody PatterningEpithelium

Identifiers

PMID19778532
PMCPMC2854166
OpenAlexW2022731004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.