ArticleNeuron2009
Computational sophistication at a single GABAergic connection.
Article in Neuron, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outwardly rectifying tonically active GABAA receptors in pyramidal cells modulate neuronal offset, not gain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diverse computational roles of GABAergic inhibition are often assumed to reflect heterogeneity in the sources of GABA and in the receptors sensing the neurotransmitter. New data suggest that distinct effects on integration of excitatory inputs by cerebellar granule cells might result from different modes of signaling by individual interneurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19778499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.