ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009
Predicting protein-protein binding sites in membrane proteins.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- TMKit: a Python interface for computational analysis of transmembrane proteins.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Machine learning in computational modelling of membrane protein sequences and structures: From methodologies to applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Beyond sequence: Structure-based machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- MENSAdb: a thorough structural analysis of membrane protein dimers.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021Article
- Improved sequence-based prediction of interaction sites in α-helical transmembrane proteins by deep learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Experimental determination and data-driven prediction of homotypic transmembrane domain interfaces.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Article
- Interfaces Between Alpha-helical Integral Membrane Proteins: Characterization, Prediction, and Docking.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Article
- Review
- Computational modeling of membrane proteins.Proteins · 2015Review
- Protein inter-domain linker prediction using Random Forest and amino acid physiochemical properties.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Weakly stable regions and protein-protein interactions in beta-barrel membrane proteins.Current pharmaceutical design · 2014Review
- Cryptochrome in sponges: a key molecule linking photoreception with phototransduction.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2013Article
- Predictions of Protein-Protein Interfaces within Membrane Protein Complexes.Avicenna journal of medical biotechnology · 2013Article
- Data mining in the Life Sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle?Briefings in bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Local functional descriptors for surface comparison based binding prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Computational studies of membrane proteins: models and predictions for biological understanding.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2012Review
- Neutralizing epitopes in the membrane-proximal external region of HIV-1 gp41 are influenced by the transmembrane domain and the plasma membrane.Journal of virology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany integral membrane proteins, like their non-membrane counterparts, form either transient or permanent multi-subunit complexes in order to carry out their biochemical function. Computational methods that provide structural details of these interactions are needed since, despite their importance, relatively few structures of membrane protein complexes are available.
resultsWe present a method for predicting which residues are in protein-protein binding sites within the transmembrane regions of membrane proteins. The method uses a Random Forest classifier trained on residue type distributions and evolutionary conservation for individual surface residues, followed by spatial averaging of the residue scores. The prediction accuracy achieved for membrane proteins is comparable to that for non-membrane proteins. Also, like previous results for non-membrane proteins, the accuracy is significantly higher for residues distant from the binding site boundary. Furthermore, a predictor trained on non-membrane proteins was found to yield poor accuracy on membrane proteins, as expected from the different distribution of surface residue types between the two classes of proteins. Thus, although the same procedure can be used to predict binding sites in membrane and non-membrane proteins, separate predictors trained on each class of proteins are required. Finally, the contribution of each residue property to the overall prediction accuracy is analyzed and prediction examples are discussed.
conclusionGiven a membrane protein structure and a multiple alignment of related sequences, the presented method gives a prioritized list of which surface residues participate in intramembrane protein-protein interactions. The method has potential applications in guiding the experimental verification of membrane protein interactions, structure-based drug discovery, and also in constraining the search space for computational methods, such as protein docking or threading, that predict membrane protein complex structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.