Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19777372›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2010

Molecular medicine and concepts of disease: the ethical value of a conceptual analysis of emerging biomedical technologies.

Marianne Boenink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The prospects of precision psychiatry.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The personalized medicine discourse: archaeology and genealogy.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marianne BoeninkDepartment of Philosophy, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands. m.boenink@utwente.nl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is now generally acknowledged that new biomedical technologies often produce new definitions and sometimes even new concepts of disease, this observation is rarely used in research that anticipates potential ethical issues in emerging technologies. This article argues that it is useful to start with an analysis of implied concepts of disease when anticipating ethical issues of biomedical technologies. It shows, moreover, that it is possible to do so at an early stage, i.e. when a technology is only just emerging. The specific case analysed here is that of 'molecular medicine'. This group of emerging technologies combines a 'cascade model' of disease processes with a 'personal pattern' model of bodily functioning. Whereas the ethical implications of the first are partly familiar from earlier--albeit controversial--forms of preventive and predictive medicine, those of the second are quite novel and potentially far-reaching.

Indexed as

MedicinePhilosophy, MedicalBiomedical TechnologyDiagnosisHumansMolecular BiologyMonitoring, PhysiologicTechnology Assessment, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID19777372
PMCPMC2801843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.