ArticlePloS one2009
Highly sensitive detection of individual HEAT and ARM repeats with HHpred and COACH.
Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
- Analysis of domain organization and functional signatures of trypanosomatid keIF4Gs.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2022Article
- Molecular Characterization and Immuno-Reactivity Patterns of a NovelFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Article
- Metazoan evolution of the armadillo repeat superfamily.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017Article
- Article
- Phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate: regulation of cellular events in space and time.Biochemical Society transactions · 2016Review
- Structural Insights into Separase Architecture and Substrate Recognition through Computational Modelling of Caspase-Like and Death Domains.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Article
- β-Catenin-related protein WRM-1 is a multifunctional regulatory subunit of the LIT-1 MAPK complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- Article
- Expansion and Function of Repeat Domain Proteins During Stress and Development in Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Review
- Structural and mutational analysis reveals that CTNNBL1 binds NLSs in a manner distinct from that of its closest armadillo-relative, karyopherin α.FEBS letters · 2014Article
- Article
- Rpn1 and Rpn2 coordinate ubiquitin processing factors at proteasome.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2012Article
- X-ray crystal structure of the UCS domain-containing UNC-45 myosin chaperone from Drosophila melanogaster.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2011Article
- Insights into the domain and repeat architecture of target of rapamycin.Journal of structural biology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHEAT and ARM repeats occur in a large number of eukaryotic proteins. As these repeats are often highly diverged, the prediction of HEAT or ARM domains can be challenging. Except for the most clear-cut cases, identification at the individual repeat level is indispensable, in particular for determining domain boundaries. However, methods using single sequence queries do not have the sensitivity required to deal with more divergent repeats and, when applied to proteins with known structures, in some cases failed to detect a single repeat. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL
findingsTesting algorithms which use multiple sequence alignments as queries, we found two of them, HHpred and COACH, to detect HEAT and ARM repeats with greatly enhanced sensitivity. Calibration against experimentally determined structures suggests the use of three score classes with increasing confidence in the prediction, and prediction thresholds for each method. When we applied a new protocol using both HHpred and COACH to these structures, it detected 82% of HEAT repeats and 90% of ARM repeats, with the minimum for a given protein of 57% for HEAT repeats and 60% for ARM repeats. Application to bona fide HEAT and ARM proteins or domains indicated that similar numbers can be expected for the full complement of HEAT/ARM proteins. A systematic screen of the Protein Data Bank for false positive hits revealed their number to be low, in particular for ARM repeats. Double false positive hits for a given protein were rare for HEAT and not at all observed for ARM repeats. In combination with fold prediction and consistency checking (multiple sequence alignments, secondary structure prediction, and position analysis), repeat prediction with the new HHpred/COACH protocol dramatically improves prediction in the twilight zone of fold prediction methods, as well as the delineation of HEAT/ARM domain boundaries. SIGNIFICANCE: A protocol is presented for the identification of individual HEAT or ARM repeats which is straightforward to implement. It provides high sensitivity at a low false positive rate and will therefore greatly enhance the accuracy of predictions of HEAT and ARM domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.