Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19776746›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2009

20 years studying p53 functions in genetically engineered mice.

Lawrence A Donehower, Guillermina Lozano

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of differentTranslational lung cancer research · 2026
    Article
  2. Endocytic Control of Cell-Autonomous and Non-Cell-Autonomous Functions of p53.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Toward a CRISPR-based mouse model ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cells · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lawrence A DonehowerDepartment of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. larryd@bcm.edu
Guillermina Lozano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell and molecular biological studies of p53 functions over the past 30 years have been complemented in the past 20 years by studies that use genetically engineered mice. As expected, mice that have mutant Trp53 alleles usually develop cancers of various types more rapidly than their counterparts that have wild-type Trp53 genes. These mouse studies have been instrumental in providing important new insights into p53 tumour suppressor function. Such studies have been facilitated by the development of increasingly sophisticated genetic engineering approaches, which allow the more precise manipulation of p53 structure and function in a mammalian model.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalGenetic EngineeringMiceAnimalsHumansMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicNeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID19776746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.