Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19774424›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2009

A matched case-control study of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: routine drainage is not justified.

James J Mezhir, Murray F Brennan, Raymond E Baser, Michael I D'Angelica, Yuman Fong, Ronald P DeMatteo, William R Jarnagin, Peter J Allen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04289831 ("Impact of Preoperative Biliary Drainage on Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes After Pancreatico-Duodenectomy in Patients With Operable Malignant Periampulary Tumors. A Randomized Controlled Study"), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04289831 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

"Impact of Preoperative Biliary Drainage on Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes After Pancreatico-Duodenectomy in Patients With Operable Malignant Periampulary Tumors. A Randomized Controlled Study"

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlexandriaRan2015 to 2019Enrolled150ConditionsPeriampullary Cancer, Biliary Obstruction, Preoperative Biliary DrainageArmsPreoperative Biliary Drainage (PBD), Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. PRE-OPERATIVE BILIARY DRAINAGE IN THE PERIAMPULLARY NEOPLASIA - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Surgical management of biliary malignancy.Current problems in surgery · 2021
    Article
  18. Outcomes with Preoperative Biliary Stenting After Pancreaticoduodenectomy In the Modern Era.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Does the Microbiology of Bactibilia Drive Postoperative Complications After Pancreatoduodenectomy?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James J MezhirDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Murray F Brennan
Raymond E Baser
Michael I D'Angelica
Yuman Fong
Ronald P DeMatteo
William R Jarnagin
Peter J Allen
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative biliary drainage (PBD) prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) continues to be routine in many centers despite retrospective and randomized data showing that PBD increases perioperative infectious complications.

methodsReview of a prospectively maintained database identified 340 consecutive patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent PD between 2000 and 2005. From this cohort, 94 PBD and 94 nonstented (no-PBD) patients were matched for age, gender, preoperative albumin, and bilirubin levels (PBD group: prestent bilirubin; no-PBD group: preoperative bilirubin).

resultsThe majority of PBD patients (89%) underwent internal endoscopic biliary drainage. Stent-related complications occurred in 46 patients (23%) and resulted in a significant delay in time to resection. In the matched-pair comparison, there was more operative blood loss in PBD patients, but similar operative times, transfusions, and hospital stay. Bile cultures were positive in 82% of PBD patients versus 7% no PBD. There was a statistically significant increase in infectious complications including wound infections and intra-abdominal abscess in PBD patients, but equal incidence of anastomotic leak.

conclusionsIn this case-matched control study, PBD was associated with a stent-related complication rate of 23% and resulted in a twofold increase in postpancreatectomy infectious complications. The routine use of PBD remains unjustified.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile DuctsBlood Loss, SurgicalCase-Control StudiesCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeDrainageEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomy

Identifiers

PMID19774424
OpenAlexW1993341994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.