Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19774356›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2009

[The current state of the art of chemotherapy of penile cancer: results of a nationwide survey of German clinics].

C Protzel, S Ruppin, S Milerski, K-J Klebingat, O W Hakenberg

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03943602 (Cabozantinib in Patients With Advanced Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03943602 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Cabozantinib in Patients With Advanced Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma (PSCC): an Open-label, Single-center, Phase 2, Single-arm Trial (CaboPen)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoRan2019 to 2022Enrolled37ConditionsPenile Squamous Cell CarcinomaArmsCabozantinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Current diagnostics and treatment of penile cancer].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. [Penile cancer : Diagnosis and treatment].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Rare cancers: Challenges & issues.The Indian journal of medical research · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Penile cancer: current therapy and future directions.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2013
    Review
  12. [Penile carcinoma: diagnosis and therapy].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Chemotherapy in penile cancer.Therapeutic advances in urology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C ProtzelKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universität, Ernst-Heydemann-Strasse 6, 18055, Rostock, Deutschland. chris.protzel@med.uni-rostock.de
S Ruppin
S Milerski
K-J Klebingat
O W Hakenberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe prognosis for advanced penile carcinomas is extremely poor. Due to the low response rates and relevant side effects of current chemotherapy regimens, several attempts have been made to improve chemotherapy in recent years. In a retrospective survey the current state of the art of chemotherapy for penile carcinoma in Germany was analysed.

methodsThe study took the form of a retrospective survey among all urological departments in Germany. The questionnaire contained seven questions concerning indications and modalities for chemotherapy of penile carcinoma in addition to general questions.

resultsOut of 280 departments 129 (46%) returned an answered questionnaire. Chemotherapy was reported to be carried out by 91 of the answering departments and overall 18 different chemotherapy regimens were used. The regimens cisplatin/methotrexate/bleomycin, vinblastin/methotrexate/bleomycin and cisplatin/5FU were the most frequently reported. Chemotherapy was carried out on average 2.3 times per year per department. The majority of the departments reported response rates under 30%. Finally 101 of the answering departments confirmed the necessity of new chemotherapy regimens.

conclusionsThe current state of the art for chemotherapy of penile carcinoma showed a very large variation in Germany. The response rates were disappointing. A nationwide study with new chemotherapy approaches is urgently needed (information under www.uni-rostock.de/peniskarzinom).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug TherapyGermanyHumansMalePenile NeoplasmsPhysiciansPopulation DynamicsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesUrology Department, HospitalAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.