ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2010
Detection of contamination during organ culture of the human cornea.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Temperature, Bottle Type, and Amphotericin B on Fungal Detection in Corneal Preservation Media Using the BACT/ALERT SystemMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Cytoprotective Effects of Human Platelet Lysate during the Xeno-Free Culture of Human Donor Corneas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Comparison of Microbial Sampling Sites and Donor-Related Factors on Corneal Graft Contamination.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Factors influencing the contamination rates of the conjunctival swabs and organ culture media of human donor eyes.Medicine · 2018Observational
- Eye preservation tectonic graft using glycerol-preserved donor cornea.Eye (London, England) · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCorneas harvested post-mortem are at risk of contamination, therefore antibiotic additives are used in cold storage and organ culture systems. In the latter, sterility testing of the medium is part of the standard protocol. Intuitively, testing after longer organ culture periods should be more likely to detect contaminations than early testing, but may delay allocation. This study evaluates whether an optimal time for detection of donor cornea contamination can be identified.
methodsThe study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. All procedures were supervised using a certified quality management system (ISO 9001:2000). Donor corneas harvested by enucleation or corneoscleral excision over 5 consecutive years were processed according to German and EC laws and guidelines. The corneas were stored in a closed organ culture system in 100 ml MEM containing penicillin, streptomycin and amphotericin B at 31 degrees C for up to 28 days without media exchange. In 762 corneas, 10 ml samples of medium, obtained between days 3 and 8 of culture, were tested for sterility in an automated detection system (BacT/ALERT, bioMérieux). In 424 corneas, a second sterility test was performed from the same medium before release. Contamination detection probabilities were related to the culture duration before the primary test (Cochran-Armitage).
resultsOverall, 19 contaminations were found. Contaminations were bilateral in four donors. One contamination was apparent by macroscopic inspection of the medium prior to the primary sterility test; 12 were detected upon primary sterility testing. Furthermore, six primarily undetected contaminations were observed: five in the secondary sterility test and one suspected microscopically. In most cases, contamination could also be seen by medium turbidity and acidification, but in three cases macroscopic medium changes were significantly delayed or absent. No trends were found between the times of primary sterility sampling and both positive and false negative test outcome probabilities.
conclusionDetection probability of contaminations in organ culture media does not increase between days 3 and 8; therefore, sterility can be tested on day 3. With the recommended follow-up after sterility testing being 7 days, microbiologic release can take place after 10 days of culture. Nevertheless, the testing is not failsafe, and should always be combined with macroscopic inspection of the media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19774353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.