SynthesisBMC medicine2009
Quality of medication use in primary care--mapping the problem, working to a solution: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence, contributing factors, and interventions to reduce medication errors in outpatient and ambulatory settings: a systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Pooled it
- Prevalence of inappropriate medication use in residential long-term care facilities for the elderly: A systematic review.The European journal of general practice · 2017Pooled it
- Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: a systematic review.BMC medical research methodology · 2011Pooled it
- Ambulatory Medication Safety in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMPooled it
- Trial
- A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.Lancet (London, England) · 2012Trial
- Time-Restricted Eating in Real-World Healthcare Settings: Utilisation and Short-Term Outcomes Evaluation.Nutrients · 2024Observational
- Is primary care a patient-safe setting? Prevalence, severity, nature, and causes of adverse events: numerous and mostly avoidable.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023Article
- Article
- Diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia medication prescribing in Qatari primary care settings: a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2021Article
- Multiplicity and complexity: a qualitative exploration of influences on prescribing in UK general practice.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Improving Primary Care Medication Processes by Using Shared Electronic Medication Plans in Switzerland: Lessons Learned From a Participatory Action Research Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- [Descriptive analysis of medication errors notified by Primary Health Care: Learning from errors].Atencion primaria · 2020Observational
- Clinical pharmacists in primary care: a safe solution to the workforce crisis?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2018Review
- Repeat prescribing of medications: A system-centred risk management model for primary care organisations.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2017Article
- Observational
- Systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) for lung cancer and its potential for interactions with other medicines.Ecancermedicalscience · 2017Article
- Identification of priorities for improvement of medication safety in primary care: a PRIORITIZE study.BMC family practice · 2016Article
- Applying quality improvement methods to address gaps in medicines reconciliation at transfers of care from an acute UK hospital.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Task analysis of information technology-mediated medication management in outpatient care.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe UK, USA and the World Health Organization have identified improved patient safety in healthcare as a priority. Medication error has been identified as one of the most frequent forms of medical error and is associated with significant medical harm. Errors are the result of the systems that produce them. In industrial settings, a range of systematic techniques have been designed to reduce error and waste. The first stage of these processes is to map out the whole system and its reliability at each stage. However, to date, studies of medication error and solutions have concentrated on individual parts of the whole system. In this paper we wished to conduct a systematic review of the literature, in order to map out the medication system with its associated errors and failures in quality, to assess the strength of the evidence and to use approaches from quality management to identify ways in which the system could be made safer.
methodsWe mapped out the medicines management system in primary care in the UK. We conducted a systematic literature review in order to refine our map of the system and to establish the quality of the research and reliability of the system.
resultsThe map demonstrated that the proportion of errors in the management system for medicines in primary care is very high. Several stages of the process had error rates of 50% or more: repeat prescribing reviews, interface prescribing and communication and patient adherence. When including the efficacy of the medicine in the system, the available evidence suggested that only between 4% and 21% of patients achieved the optimum benefit from their medication. Whilst there were some limitations in the evidence base, including the error rate measurement and the sampling strategies employed, there was sufficient information to indicate the ways in which the system could be improved, using management approaches. The first step to improving the overall quality would be routine monitoring of adherence, clinical effectiveness and hospital admissions.
conclusionBy adopting the whole system approach from a management perspective we have found where failures in quality occur in medication use in primary care in the UK, and where weaknesses occur in the associated evidence base. Quality management approaches have allowed us to develop a coherent change and research agenda in order to tackle these, so far, fairly intractable problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.