Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19771459›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2009

Cardiac volumetry in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a comparative study correlating multi-slice computed tomography and magnetic resonance tomography. Reasons for intermodal disagreement.

Janina Schroeder, Andreas Peterschroeder, Bernhard Vaske, Thomas Butz, Peter Barth, Olaf Oldenburg, Thomas Bitter, Wolfgang Burchert, Dieter Horstkotte, Christoph Langer

Abstract readComparative StudyControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Diagnostic approaches for diabetic cardiomyopathy.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Severe dyspnoea during late pregnancy in a woman with history of asthma.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2011
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Speckle tracking: distinction of physiologic from pathologic LVH?The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Janina SchroederDepartment of Cardiology, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Andreas Peterschroeder
Bernhard Vaske
Thomas Butz
Peter Barth
Olaf Oldenburg
Thomas Bitter
Wolfgang Burchert
Dieter Horstkotte
Christoph Langer
University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DERuhr University Bochum · DEHeart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia · DEZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn humans with normal hearts multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) based volumetry was shown to correlate well with the gold standard, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We correlated both techniques in patients with various degrees of heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) resulting from cardiac dilatation.

methodsTwenty-four patients with a left ventricular enddiastolic volume (LV-EDV) of C 150 ml measured by angiography underwent MSCT and CMR scanning for left and right ventricular (LV, RV) volumetry. MSCT based short cardiac axis views were obtained beginning at the cardiac base advancing to the apex. These were reconstructed in 20 different time windows of the RR-interval (0-95%) serving for identification of enddiastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) and for planimetry. ED and ES volumes and the ejection fraction (EF) were calculated for LV and RV. MSCT based volumetry was compared with CMR.

resultsMSCT based LV volumetry significantly correlates with CMR as follows: LV-EDV r = 0.94, LV-ESV r = 0.98 and LV-EF r = 0.93, but significantly overestimates LV-EDV and LV-ESV and underestimates EF (P \ 0.0001). MSCT based RV volumetry significantly correlates with CMR as follows: RV-EDV r = 0.79, RVESV r = 0.78 and RV-EF r = 0.73, but again significantly overestimates RV-EDV and RV-ESV and underestimates RV-EF (P \ 0.0001).

conclusionWhen compared with CMR a continuous overestimation of volumes and underestimation of EF needs to be considered when applying MSCT in HFREF patients.

Indexed as

Cardiac VolumeAdultAgedFemaleHeart FailureHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedVentricular Dysfunction, Left

Identifiers

PMID19771459
OpenAlexW2053539933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.