Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19771334›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2009

Visualization of molecular interactions using bimolecular fluorescence complementation analysis: characteristics of protein fragment complementation.

Tom K Kerppola

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nanotechnological Applications Based on Bacterial Encapsulins.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Detecting protein-protein interactions by Xe-129 NMR.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tom K KerppolaHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0650, USA. kerppola@umich.edu
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Optimization of Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation Probes for New Imaging FR01GM086213 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KERPPOLA, TOM KLAUS, REDDY, KAREN LYNN · 2008 to 2011
$2.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigations of the molecular processes that sustain life must include studies of these processes in their normal cellular environment. The bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay provides an approach for the visualization of protein interactions and modifications in living cells. This assay is based on the facilitated association of complementary fragments of a fluorescent protein that are fused to interaction partners. Complex formation by the interaction partners tethers the fluorescent protein fragments in proximity to each other, which can facilitate their association. The BiFC assay enables sensitive visualization of protein complexes with high spatial resolution. The temporal resolution of BiFC analysis is limited by the time required for fluorophore formation, as well as the stabilization of complexes by association of the fluorescent protein fragments. Many modifications and enhancements to the BiFC assay have been developed. The multicolor BiFC assay enables simultaneous visualization of multiple protein complexes in the same cell, and can be used to investigate competition among mutually exclusive interaction partners for complex formation in cells. The ubiquitin-mediated fluorescence complementation (UbFC) assay enables visualization of covalent ubiquitin family peptide conjugation to substrate proteins in cells. The BiFC assay can also be used to visualize protein binding to specific chromatin domains, as well as other molecular scaffolds in cells. BiFC analysis therefore provides a powerful approach for the visualization of a variety of processes that affect molecular proximity in living cells. The visualization of macromolecular interactions and modifications is of great importance owing to the central roles of proteins, nucleic acids and other macromolecular complexes in the regulation of cellular functions. This tutorial review describes the BiFC assay, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of this experimental approach. The review will be of interest to scientists interested in the investigation of macromolecular interactions or modifications who need exquisite sensitivity for the detection of their complexes or conjugates of interest.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsCell Physiological PhenomenaFluorescenceMicroscopy, FluorescencePlant ProteinsProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingProtein MultimerizationProteomicsSpectrometry, FluorescenceTransfectionTwo-Hybrid System TechniquesBacterial ProteinsBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19771334
PMCPMC2980501
OpenAlexW2012521895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.